State v. Green
State v. Green, 616 So. 2d 1262 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992).
Cited by
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LeRouge 995 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Madison v. ERNEST N. MORIAL CONVENT. CENTER 834 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Boteler v. Rivera 700 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- Beecher v. Keel 645 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Maltby v. Gauthier 506 So. 2d 1190
- State ex rel. Counterman v. Whitley 611 So. 2d 661
Opinion text
Applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the 9th Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides # 215,011 Judge Alfred Mansour. WRIT DENIED: La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8, which establishes time limits for filing post-conviction relief applications, provides a reasonable time after its enactment for persons adversely affected to assert their rights prior to the time limitations contained in the article. Maltby v. Gauthier, 506 So.2d 1190 (La.1987). Accordingly, we find the article does not constitute an unconstitutional ex post facto application of law. See State v. Counterman, 611 So.2d 661 (La.App. 1 Cir.1992). Relator’s application was submitted well after the deadlines established by Article 930.8 and was, therefore, properly denied by the trial court as untimely.