Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Parker v. State, 592 So. 2d 419.
- Karlin Riley Versus Rachel Lee Hollander, John D. Hollander, and Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- Dean Classic Cars, L.L.C. v. Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. ex rel. Department of Public Safety, Office of … 978 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- DEAN CLASSIC CARS v. Fidelity Bank 978 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- MUNAR v. State Farm Ins. Co. 972 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Maria M. Munar v. State Farm Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
Vernis S. Hinchee v. Soloco, L. L. C.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 1991), writ denied, wherein the first circuit found no abuse of discretion where the trial court refused to allow the State to submit or develop new evidence on rebuttal where the intent of the evidence was not to rebut matters raised by the defendant in its defense, but to introduce new evidenc
-
Hinchee v. SOLOCO, LLC
971 So. 2d 478
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1 Cir.1991), , writ denied, wherein the first circuit found no abuse of discretion where the trial court refused to allow the State to submit or develop new evidence on rebuttal where the intent of the evidence was not to rebut matters raised by the defendant in its defense, but to introduce new evidence.
- Rideau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 970 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- Hussey v. Russell 934 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 878 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- Phillips v. Joseph Management Services, Inc. 861 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Smith v. Davill Petroleum Co., Inc. 744 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Bourgeois v. Heritage Manor of Houma 691 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- Cott Index Co. v. Jagneaux 685 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
Sledge v. Continental Cas. Co.
654 So. 2d 358
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
See, Walker, supra, (no abuse of discretion in casting costs 50% to each litigant where jury apportioned fault 90% to plaintiff and 10% to defendant.); (La.App.
- Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 650 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Maynor v. Vosburg 648 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
-
Thibodeaux v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.
647 So. 2d 351
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
1st Cir.), writ denied (La.
- Scheidt v. Denney 644 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Stephens v. Town of Jonesboro 642 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- Parfait v. Hospital Service District No. 1 638 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Smith v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 603 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
State ex rel. Guste v. Nicholls College Foundation
593 So. 2d 651
La. 1992
Prior report: La.App., .