State ex rel. Simmons v. State
State ex rel. Simmons v. State, 592 So. 2d 513 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992).
Cited by
- State ex rel. Ricks v. State 604 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. McCabe 420 So. 2d 955
- State v. Bodley 394 So. 2d 584
Opinion text
WRIT DENIED: Since relator is represented by counsel, he should proceed through his attorney. Relator has no right to be both represented and representative. See State v. McCabe, 420 So.2d 955 (La. 1982); State v. Bodley, 394 So.2d 584 (La. 1981). This Court will not review the merits of an application filed by a pro se applicant who is represented by counsel unless the applicant alleges deficiencies in the performance of his counsel and has presented that complaint to the district court. Herein, if relator seeks to resume the hearing on his application for post conviction relief or complain of his counsel’s performance, he should first address those complaints to the district court.