No. W88-899
Precedential
Processed
Venable v. Smith
Venable v. Smith, 529 So. 2d 888 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988).
Cited by
- St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal Dist. v. Violet Dock Port, Inc. 246 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- McHugh v. Chastant 503 So. 2d 791
Opinion text
WRIT DENIED: There is no error in the ruling complained of. An in camera inspection by the trial court to determine whether or not an attorney’s file contains discoverable material is not a violation of C.C.P. art. 1422 et seq. Also, see McHugh v. Chastant, 503 So.2d 791 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987).