Pope v. Penrod Drilling Co.
Pope v. Penrod Drilling Co., 548 So. 2d 37 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989).
Cited by
- Succession of Jurisich 694 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- Succession of Cure 633 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Succession of Lawrence 623 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Succession of Bertaut 572 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Bergeron v. Main Iron Works, Inc. 563 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Pope v. Pendrod Drilling Co. 551 So. 2d 623 La. 1989
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Cambridge Corner Corp. v. Menard 525 So. 2d 527
Opinion text
WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY: The trial court erred in denying relator’s request for a jury trial. La.Code Civ.Proc. art. 1732(6) only affects suits that have been filed after the amendment’s effective date. Cambridge Corner Corp. v. Menard, 525 So.2d 527 (La.1988); Marks v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., an unreported decision bearing Number W89-447 on the Docket of the Court rendered on May 1, 1989. Since C.C.P. art. 1732(6) was not effective until September 7, 1988 and since this suit was filed on May 21, 1986, relator is entitled to a jury trial. IT IS ORDERED that the trial court’s judgment striking relator’s prayer for a jury trial be and the same is hereby reversed.