Nos. 11-54
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. C.M.
State ex rel. C.M., 68 So. 3d 47 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011).
Cited by
- State in the Interest of I. B. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- State in the Interest of G. E. K. & C. E. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- State ex rel. G.E.K. 155 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State in the Interest of J. S. B. & B. L. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- State ex rel. P.A. 68 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Opinion text
SAUNDERS, Judge, dissents and assigns written reasons. b The record, as I read it, does not support the conclusion that there is no reasonable expectation of significant improvement in the mother’s condition or conduct. Accordingly, I do not believe that the State has met its burden of proof, and I respectfully dissent.