Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 149 So. 3d 1282 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014).
Cited by
- Scott Green Properties, LLC and Scott Green v. R. Scott Ramsey, Jr., Edward Roe, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
- Selene Cabrera v. Joshua James Lewis, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- Dionisio Gonzalez v. Carey Leshawn Jimmerson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- Andre Henderson v. Avoyelles Correctional Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- Henderson v. Avoyelles Correctional Center 190 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. 149 So. 3d 899
Opinion text
PICKETT, Judge. |, For the reasons set forth in the companion case hereto, Ed Grabowski, et ux. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., 14-433 c/w 13-1409, (La.App. 3 Cir.10/1/14), 149 So.3d 899 , the writ application is denied. The judgment of the trial court granting the Motion to Close the Record is affirmed. The grants of summary judgment in favor of Smith & Nephew, Inc., PUREPLAY Orthopaedic Sales 1 Ltd., and Daniel Forrest are reversed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Costs of the writ application are assessed to the Grabowskis. Costs of the appeal are assessed to Smith & Nephew, Inc. PUREPLAY Orthopaedic Sales 1 Ltd., and Daniel Forrest. WRIT DENIED. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.