Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., 61 So. 787.

35 citing documents.

Manuel v. Manuel 299 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., Ltd. et al., , 61 So.
Summers v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 229 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., Ltd., et al., , 61 So.
Howard v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 179 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., Ltd., et al., , 61 So.
Hebert v. Travelers Insurance Company 179 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., Ltd., et al., , 61 So.
Evans v. Phoenix Insurance Co. 175 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. 137 So. 2d 298 La. 1962
Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Johnson v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co. 110 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
“See, also Sheild v. F. Johnson & Son Co., Ltd., , 61 So.
Edelman v. Refrigeration Equipment Co. 72 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
McDowell v. National Sur. Corp. 68 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Abrego v. Tri-State Transit Co., La.App., ; Shield v. Johnson & Co., Ltd., *195 , 61 So.
Lynch v. Fisher 34 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Abrego v. Tri-State Transit Co. 22 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Objection was made to evidence on this defense on the ground that one codefendant in a tort action cannot plead the last clear chance against another co-defendant, which objection was sustained by authority of the ruling in the case of Shield v. Johnson Son Company, Ltd., , 61 So.
Huguet v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 200 So. 141 La. 1941
Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., So.
Augustine v. Blasini 176 So. 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
See Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., Ltd., , 61 So.
Danove v. Mahoney 176 So. 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
See Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., Ltd., et al., , 61 So.
Guernsey v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 172 So. 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
69 ; Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Battalora v. Carnahan Creamery 157 So. 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
121 ; Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Holderith v. Zilbermann 151 So. 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
668 (of this court) this day decided; Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Company et al., , 61 So.
Labat v. Gaerthner Realty Co., Inc. 146 So. 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
In Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Thibodeaux v. Star Checker Cab Co. 143 So. 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Shield v. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Bethancourt v. Bayhi 141 So. 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
121 , and Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Welch v. Louisiana Oil Refg. Corp. 135 So. 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Shield v. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Weigand v. General Outdoor Advertising Co. 134 So. 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
been many times held, notably in Shield v. Johnson & Son Co. et al., , 61 So.
Cazeaux v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 134 So. 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Tarleton-Gaspard v. Malochee 133 So. 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
We have reached the conclusion that both drivers were guilty of carelessness and negligence, which jointly and concurrently was the proximate cause of the accident and injuries of the plaintiff, in this connection we quoce the following from the syllabus of Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co. et al., , 61 So.
Horrell v. Gulf & Valley Cotton Oil Co. 131 So. 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
In Shield v. F. Johnson & Son Co., Ltd., et al., , 61 So.
Denham v. Taylor 131 So. 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Shield v. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Sears v. Interurban Transp. Co. 125 So. 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Huddy on Automobiles (8th Ed.) p. 364; Shield v. F. Johnson & Sons Co., , 61 So.
Geismar v. Gaisser 124 So. 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Cazeaux v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 124 So. 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
App. 351; Shield v. Johnson & Son Co., , 61 So.
Paderas v. Stauffer 120 So. 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
See also, Shield vs. F. Johnson & Son Co., Ltd., , 61 So.
Reneau v. Brown 158 So. 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
See Shield vs. F. Johnsons & Sons Company, Ltd., et al., , 61 So.
Ducharme v. Smith 119 So. 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Blake v. Jefferson-St. Charles Transfer Co. 8 La. App. 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In the case of Shields vs. Johnson & Son, et als., , 61 So.
Overruled Poncet v. South N. O. Light & Traction Co. 7 La. App. 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
1st: In the case of Mistress Shields vs. Johnson, , the plaintiff sued “for doctor bills, nurse bills, drug bills, clothing, and ambulance service connected with the injury alleged by plaintiff”.
Maxwell v. N. O. Ry. & Lt. Co. 6 Pelt. 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1922