Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Francis, 60 So. 3d 703.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Malik K. Lawson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 2/16/11), (citing State v. Bell, 09-0574, p. 14 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Tate La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Nelson 260 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 708.
State v. Loicana 254 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 708 (citing State v. Bell, 09-0574, p. 14 (La.
State v. Gayton 156 So. 3d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/16/11); (quotations omitted).
State v. Greenberry 141 So. 3d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/16/11), ; State v. Allen, 01-0939, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Hall 134 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 707-OS, this Court recognized that while an individual’s presence in a high-crime area, standing alone, is not sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion, an area’s reputation is a fact upon which officers may rely in determining reasonable suspicion, and which a trial court may consider as part of the totality of
State v. McClendon 133 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/16/11), (citing State v. Bell, 09-0574, p. 14 (La.App.
State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/16/11), (quoting State v. Bell, 09-0574, p. 14 (La.App.
State v. Howard 120 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Fields 120 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Chaplain 114 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 708 writ denied, 2011-0571 (La.10/7/11), .
State v. Bentley 116 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 708 writ denied, 11-0571 (La.10/7/11), .
State v. Guillot 115 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 708 writ denied, 11-0571 (La.10/7/11), .
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 708 writ denied, 11-0571 (La.10/7/11), .
State v. Butler 101 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 2/16/11) , ; see State v. Sims, 2002-2208 (La.6/27/03), (even after a lawful investigatory stop, a police officer may *125 frisk the suspect only where a reasonably prudent person would be warranted in the belief that his safety or that of others is in danger); La.Code Crim.
State v. Harris 98 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lee 83 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 2/16/11), (“Importantly, we do not confuse the automatic search authorized incident to a lawful arrest as an analogue for the frisk that accompanies a Terry stop.”) The question did not seek relevant evidence and there was no abuse of discretion in excluding such irrelevant evidence.
State v. Mulder 76 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 4 Cir. 2/16/11), (police officers lacked a sufficient basis to frisk the defendant subject to an investigatory stop when the sole apparent basis for the frisk was the officer’s stated practice of always frisking a subject under a certain set of circumstances).
State v. Bell 70 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011