Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doe v. Southern Gyms, LLC, 112 So. 3d 822.

20 citing documents.

Paulette Stoke, Ricquel Hale, Rodney Thomas, Joinell Stokes, Angellica Bozant, Alvin Jones and Carol Jones v. the City … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Darnette Daniels, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Tayler McClendon v. State of Louisiana, Board of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
3/19/13), our Supreme Court enumerated components of numerosity developed by continuing jurisprudence: Although not as well-developed or relied on as the preceding guidelines, various other factors have developed in the jurisprudence for determining the practicality of joinder of a large number of
Ashley Pratt, Individually and on behalf of all others similarity situated v. University of Louisiana at Lafayette, The … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Michael Brantley, Jr. Versus City of Gretna & Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
3/19/13), Brooks, 13 So.3d at 554.
Roderick Sanders on behalf of Himself and A Class Of Similarly Situated Louisiana Residents v. City of Winnfield La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Joseph Allen, Steven Ayres, Ashley Hurlburt, Rory Kevin Gates, James Howard, Demarcus Morrow, Rodney Waller, Keith Arcement, Frederick … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Roger Reeves, Susan Fullerton, Henry Gregory, Rodney Broadway, Anita Darbonne and Ray Powell v. Explo Systems, Inc. and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
3/19/13), Ford v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., supra; Dupree v. Lafayette Ins.
Opelousas General Hospital Authority, a Public Trust, D/B/A Opelousas General Health System v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Joseph Harvey Gautreaux v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Anderson v. City of New Orleans 248 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/19/13), , 832-33 (finding that the general rule in favor of certifying a class does not obviate the requirement that courts conduct a rigorous analysis and take a close look at a case to determine if the statutory requirements have been satisfied).
Bagot v. James Holdings, LLC 235 So. 3d 1330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Aaron Emigh v. West Calcasieu Cameron Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Numerosity “The numerosity requirement does not have a strict numbers threshold, rather it is based on the facts and circumstances of each case and requires a showing that ‘joinder is impractical and there is a definable group of aggrieved persons.’ Doe v. Southern Gyms, LLC, 12-1566, p. 12 (La.3/19/13) ” Vallare, 151 So.3d at 989.
Fontcuberta v. Cleco Corp. 222 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Duhon v. Harbor Homeowners' Ass'n 197 So. 3d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
LLC, 2012-1566, p. 9 (La.3/19/13); .
Albe v. City of New Orleans 174 So. 3d 212 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015
| Jn Doe v. Southern Gyms, L.L.C., 12-1556 (La.3/19/13), , the Court stated: A rigorous analysis must be used to determine whether a class action meets the requirements imposed by law, since this procedural device is an exception to the rule that litigation be conducted by and on behalf of the individually named parties only.
Claborne v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 165 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The appellate standard of review in class certification cases was reiterated in Doe v. Southern Gyms, LLC, 2012-1566, p. 9 (La.3/19/13), , as follows: In reviewing a class certification, the trial court’s factual findings are subject to the manifest error standard; however, the ultimate decision of whether or not to certify the class is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.
Gloria Vallare v. Ville Platte Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Vallare v. Ville Platte Medical Center, LLC 151 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The numerosity requirement does not have a strict numbers threshold, rather it is based on the facts and circumstances of each case and requires a showing that “joinder is impractical and there is a definable group of aggrieved persons.” Doe v. Southern, Gyms, LLC, 12-1566, p. 12 (La.3/19/13) .
Doe v. University Healthcare Systems, L.L.C. 145 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Doe v. Southern Gyms, LLC, 12-1566, p. 6 (La.3/19/13), -828 (citing Ford v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913, p. 4 (La.9/9/97), ), the Supreme Court stated the following: [t]he class action is a nontraditional litigation procedure permitting a representative with typical claims to sue or defend on behalf of, and stand in judgment for, a class of sim
Smith v. City of New Orleans 131 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Whether the district court applied the correct legal standard in determining whether to certify the class is reviewed de novo.” Doe v. S. Gyms, LLC, 12-1566, p. 9 (La.3/19/13), [citations omitted].