Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jefferson v. Gamm, 90 So. 682.

16 citing documents.

Cloud v. Cloud 127 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
372 , ]), but that the district courts do have jurisdiction over the determination of the question of the claimant's right to the homestead (see cases cited supra) and also whether a particular debt is or is not one for which the homestead may be seized and sold.
City of New Orleans v. Folkman 71 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
372 , ; Meyer v. McClellan, La.App., ; McQuerry v. Arent, La.App., 167 So.
Acosta v. Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans 38 So. 2d 391 La. 1948
372 , ; Andrews v. Mc Creary Lbr.
Meyer v. McClellan 26 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Daniel v. Thigpen 194 So. 6 La. 1940
372 , ; Andrews v. McCreary Lumber Company, 155 La.
Wetherbee v. Lodwick Lumber Co. 193 So. 671 La. 1940
372 , ; King v. Hardwood Mfg.
Tilly v. Woodham 166 So. 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Overruled Tilly v. Woodham 163 So. 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Oden v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 162 So. 189 La. 1935
372 , 380, ; Andrews v. McCreary Lumber Co., 155 La.
Vidal v. Sterlington Gas Corporation 161 So. 6 La. 1935
372 , , and the cases therein cited.
State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Cage 151 So. 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
372 , .” Since the decision in the Ouachita National Bank Case, the matter has many times been passed upon by the courts of this státe and in each instance it has been held that no devolutive appeal lies from an order of seizure and sale and that this is true whether the appeal is desired by the defendant in the foreclosure
Bomarito v. Max Barnett Furniture Co. 150 So. 2 La. 1933
372 , 373, ; Uncle Sam Planting & Mfg.
Banahan v. Hughes 104 So. 486 La. 1925
372 , , and Andrews v. McCreary Lumber Co., 155 La.
Mountz v. Dyer 104 So. 123 La. 1925
372 , ; Dyer v. Mountz, 157 La.
Uncle Sam Planting Mfg. Co. v. Reynaud 103 So. 276 La. 1925
372 , ; Holland v. Bryan, 148 La.
Dyer v. Mountz 102 So. 413 La. 1924