Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. Glassell, 171 So. 846.

56 citing documents.

Byles v. Bank of Coushatta 184 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Forterra Capital, L.L.C. v. Mamal, Inc. 55 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Forterra cites the following cases in support of the merits of its claim: , 171 So.
Plaquemines Parish Government v. Getty Oil Co. 673 So. 2d 1002 La. 1996
Goins v. Goins 580 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
La.Civ.Code art. 2669; , 171 So.
Salvex, Inc. v. Lewis 546 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Seeking to clear up the prevailing confusion generated by earlier cases, , 171 So.
Daigle & Associates, Inc. v. Coleman 385 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
31:1 et seq., after a , 171 So.
Hawthorne Oil & Gas Corp. v. Continental Oil Co. 368 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone Company 329 So. 2d 744 La. 1976
Placid Oil Company v. Taylor 313 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
In its decision remanding this case, the Supreme Court stated it originally granted certiorari to consider the question of whether Placid could continue to attack the title of Mrs. Beason, its lessor, after by her compromise with the other claimants there were no longer *630 any conflicting claims as between the lessor interests, , 171 So.
Placid Oil Co. v. Taylor 313 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
In its decision remanding this case, the Supreme Court stated it originally granted certiorari to consider the question of whether Placid could continue to attack the title of Mrs. Beason, its lessor, after by her compromise with the other claimants there were no longer *630 any conflicting claims as between the lessor interests, , 171 So.
Placid Oil Company v. Taylor 306 So. 2d 664 La. 1975
appeal could alter, as between Mrs. Beason and the Taylor heirs, ownership proportions fixed by a final court judgment; as well as to determine whether Placid Oil, a mineral lessee, can continue to attack the title of Mrs. Beason, its lessor, after by her compromise with other claimants there is no longer any conflicting claim as between lessor interests, cf., Gulf *666 , 171 So.
Columbia Gulf Transmission Company v. Hoyt 215 So. 2d 114 La. 1968
Succession of Simms 195 So. 2d 114 La. 1966
LeSage v. Union Producing Co. 184 So. 2d 727 La. 1966
State, Sabine River Authority v. Salter 184 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Succession of Simms 175 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation 163 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
948 ; Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. *410 Glassell, , 171 So.
Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 131 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
idered, as in *821 Arent v. Hunter, to be in the same category as a mineral servitude.1 [Footnote 1 stated that "This is illustrated by the view of the late Chief Justice Charles A. O'Niell, who concurred in the result of Arent v. Hunter but said that he did not `* * * approve of calling a lease a servitude'."] "It was not until 1936, , 171 So.
Davis v. Laster 130 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Hodges v. Long-Bell Petroleum Company 121 So. 2d 831 La. 1960
Tinsley v. Seismic Explorations, Inc. 117 So. 2d 897 La. 1960
Under the prevailing uncertainty as to the true and definite nature of a mineral lease, in 1936 , 171 So.
Brown v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America 108 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
The exceptions were prompted by a , 171 So.
Reagan v. Murphy 105 So. 2d 210 La. 1958
1 It was not until 1936, , 171 So.
Serio v. Chadwick 66 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
The above statute in its original form was enacted to erase the ruling of the Supreme Court of Louisiana in Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. Glassell, 1936, , 171 So.
Milling v. Collector of Revenue 57 So. 2d 679 La. 1952
Milling v. Collector of Revenue 57 So. 2d 679 La. 1952
Texas Co. v. State Mineral Board 44 So. 2d 841 La. 1949
Arnold v. Sun Oil Co. 48 So. 2d 369 La. 1949
Holcombe v. Superior Oil Co. 35 So. 2d 457 La. 1948
Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. State 34 So. 2d 331 La. 1947
In the first place, , 171 So.
Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc. 21 So. 2d 510 La. 1945
Hatch v. Morgan 12 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Carter 2 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Tyson v. Surf Oil Co. 196 So. 336 La. 1940
Only a few situations have arisen which the lawmaker has seen fit to correct, the principal one being the want of an adequate remedy in the oil and gas lessee to protect or assert His rights, without concurrence of his lessor, , 171 So.
Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Reese 196 So. 558 La. 1940
It is a matter of general knowledge, and is conceded by all parties to this suit, that the cause which induced the Legislature to enact Act No. 205 of 1938 , 171 So.
Allison v. Maroun 190 So. 408 La. 1939
It is a matter of general knowledge, and is conceded by all parties to this suit, that the cause which induced the Legislature to enact Act No. 205 of 1938 , 171 So.
Nicholson v. Sellwood 187 So. 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Defendant contends that an oil and gas lease is a personal right; therefore, defendant could not be sued to cancel such a lease at any place other than his domicile, which is not in Louisiana, , 171 So.
Payne v. Walmsley 185 So. 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
De Jean v. Whisenhunt 186 So. 43 La. 1938
Emerson v. Shirley 186 So. 88 La. 1938
v. Glassell et al., , 171 So.
Garner v. Sims 185 So. 27 La. 1938
Tomlinson v. Thurmon 181 So. 458 La. 1938
Article 2696 of the Civil Code specifically provides that: “If the lessee be evicted, the lessor is answerable for the damage and loss which he sustained by the interruption of the lease.” , 171 So.
Superior Oil Producing Co. v. Leckelt 181 So. 462 La. 1938
The case of Holladay v. Darby, supra, with other cases, , 171 So.
Ford v. Williams 179 So. 298 La. 1938
United Gas Public Service Co. v. Barrett 179 So. 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Tomlinson v. Thurmon 181 So. 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Jefferson v. Childers 179 So. 30 La. 1937
Therefore, plaintiff’s exception of no cause of action to the petition of intervention, , 171 So.
United Gas Public Service Co. v. Mitchell 177 So. 697 La. 1937
That, if it should be held that the defendant’s lease covers the 7.35 acres in question, south of and adjoining the 112.36 acres described in the plaintiff’s lease, , 171 So.
Browne v. Gajan 175 So. 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
a premise with regard to the nature of the sale of an interest in minerals on or under and to be produced from land, in order to construe the character of the action presently before us in its relation to such a transaction, has since been definitely decided as a matter of law, , 171 So.
Smith v. Kennon 175 So. 763 La. 1937
In the formal judgment signed by the trial judge sustaining the exceptions of no cause and no right of action, , 171 So.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by