Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., 198 So. 656.

29 citing documents.

Physicians & Surgeons Hospital v. Leone 399 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Turner v. Southern Wheel & Rim Service, Inc. 332 So. 2d 770 La. 1976
Turner v. Southern Wheel & Rim Service, Inc. 322 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Holmes v. Holmes 270 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Distinguished Pinchera v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 206 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Thus, the instant case is not only distinguishable from the Boggs case but from the following: , 74, 198 So.
Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company 169 So. 2d 540 La. 1964
Brown v. Travelers Insurance 169 So. 2d 540 La. 1964
Mercer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 155 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Boggs v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company 125 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
In the case of Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., Inc. et al., 1940, , 74, 198 So.
Le Balnc v. Antional Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 118 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Pixley v. Employers' Mutual Liability Insurance 102 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Some years later in 1940, the author of the opinion in the Byas case, Justice Rogers, was the author of the opinion in Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Company, Inc., 1940, , 74, 198 So.
Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 99 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
The same Court, , 198 So.
Fontenot v. Fontenot 95 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Viator v. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc. 92 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
*734 The Supreme Court in Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., Inc., , 198 So.
Fontenot v. Myers 93 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Distinguished Succession of Scott 91 So. 2d 574 La. 1956
248 , Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., Inc., , 198 So.
Hammer v. Lazarone 87 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
303 ; Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., Inc., , 198 So.
Meyers v. Southwest Region Conference Ass'n of Seventh Day Adventists 79 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
This was the situation which confronted the Supreme Court in Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., Inc., , 198 So.
Rosenquist v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company 78 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
In Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., Inc., , 198 So.
Harrington v. Franklin's Stores Corp. of New Iberia 55 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Blackwell v. Wimberly 53 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
).” Reaffirming this principle, are: Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., Inc., , 198 So.
Funderburk v. Funderburk 38 So. 2d 502 La. 1949
Rigsby v. John W. Clark Lumber Co. 28 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
McLain v. National Mut. Casualty Co. 28 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
'We think, however, that this last contention is answered by the cases of Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., Inc., et al., , 74, 198 So.
Gallien v. Judge 28 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Brown v. Toler 19 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Suffice it to say that we do observe in what was said in the case of Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., Inc., et al., , 74, 198 So.
Goodman v. National Casualty Co. 15 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
As was said by the Supreme Court in the recent case of Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co., et al., , 74, 198 So.
Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 7 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
The argument that the doctrine has been extended beyond its logical limits and should not be further extended, , 198 So.
Scott v. Dalton Co. 1 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941