DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Spears v. Nesbitt, 2 So. 2d 650.

20 citing documents.

  • Sandefer & Andress, Inc. v. Pruitt 471 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Armour v. Smith 170 So. 2d 347 La. 1964
    35 ; , ; White v. Hodges, 201 La.
  • Namie v. Namie 134 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    306 ; Hightower v. Martizky, supra; , ; Achee v. Caillouet, supra; White v. Hodges, 201 La.
  • Adam v. Johnson 133 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    Spears v. Nesbit, 1941, , —This case, in our opinion, contains a more accurate reiteration of the holding of the Mulhern case.
  • Collins v. Hunter Co. 128 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    These decisions are *915 Spears v. Nesbitt, 1941, , ; Elson v. Mathewes, 1953, 224 La.
  • Gulf Oil Corporation v. Clement 118 So. 2d 361 La. 1960
    and Elson v. Mathewes, 224 La.
  • Elkins v. Roseberry 96 So. 2d 41 La. 1957
    518 ]; , ; Achee v. Caillouet, supra [ 197 La.
  • Jumonville Pipe & MacHinery Co. v. Federal Land Bank 87 So. 2d 721 La. 1956
    we held that the parties themselves had in effect divided a servitude for the purpose of development.
  • Childs v. Washington 87 So. 2d 111 La. 1956
  • Jantz v. Long Bell Petroleum Co. 86 So. 2d 918 La. 1956
  • Barnsdall Oil Co. v. Miller 69 So. 2d 21 La. 1953
    306 ; Hightower v. Martizky, supra; , ; Achee v. Caillouet, supra; White v. Hodges, 201 La.
  • Elson v. Mathewes 69 So. 2d 734 La. 1953
    Pertinent to the question of the effect of contractural relations respecting a mineral servitude between the holder thereof and the landowner, and militating against the contention of plaintiffs herein that their servitude was impossible of division, , .
  • Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Thompson 64 So. 2d 202 La. 1953
  • Wise v. Watkins 62 So. 2d 653 La. 1952
    313 , ; , ; Baker v. Wilder, 204 La.
  • Placid Oil Co. v. George 49 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    583 .” Even stronger than in the Robinson case do we find the pronouncements in the opinion, again by Mr. Chief Justice Fournet, , .
  • Hunter Co. v. Shell Oil Co. 31 So. 2d 10 La. 1947
    counsel are making an indirect attack on the order of the Commissioner, and, as we have pointed out, the validity of this order and the authority of the Commissioner to issue it are not questions before us. Counsel for plaintiff in brief state that they have not been able to find any case squarely decisive of the issue here presented, , , is most persuasive of plaintiff’s contention, if not decisive.
  • Dobbins v. Hodges 23 So. 2d 26 La. 1945
    669 ; , , and Palmer Corporation of La.
  • Baker v. Wilder 16 So. 2d 346 La. 1943
    313 , (on rehearing), , .
  • White v. Hodges 9 So. 2d 433 La. 1942
  • Hodges v. Norton 8 So. 2d 618 La. 1942