Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pepsodent Co. v. Krauss Co., 9 So. 2d 303.

14 citing documents.

Gibbs v. Delatte 927 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Louisiana Health Service v. Tarver 635 So. 2d 1090 La. 1994
9-13; , (1942); Smith v. Lyon Cypress Co., 140 La.
Reed v. Washington Parish Police Jury 518 So. 2d 1044 La. 1988
Cataldie v. Louisiana Health Service & Indem. Co. 456 So. 2d 1373 La. 1984
Reynolds v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 185 So. 2d 794 La. 1966
485 , upholding the constitutionality of price-fixing of hair cuts under a regulatory law for the barber trade; , 9 So.
CHF Finance Company v. Jochum 127 So. 2d 534 La. 1961
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo 120 So. 2d 262 La. 1960
Dr. G. H. Tichenor Antiseptic Co. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets 90 So. 2d 343 La. 1956
The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment of the lower court, , ; Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets v. Eli Lilly & Co., 5 Cir., 205 F.2d 788 , certiorari denied 346 U.S. 856 , 74 S.Ct.
Dr. G. H. Tichenor Antiseptic Co. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets 83 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
On Application for Rehearing In an application for rehearing counsel i for respondents (Schwegmann Brothers)justifiably complain that we failed to comprehend and therefore did not discuss one of their most seriously argued contentions,, i. e., that when our State Supreme Court, , , upheld the constitutionality of our Fair Trade laws there was-not presented to it and therefore not considered or discussed by it the contention that such Fair Trade laws constitute an.
Fireside Mut. Life Ins. v. Martin 66 So. 2d 511 La. 1953
711 , ; , ; Mills v. City of Baton Rouge, 210 La.
Melancon v. Mizell 44 So. 2d 826 La. 1950
Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 43 So. 2d 248 La. 1949
Pepsodent Company v. Krauss Company, Ltd., , , concerned a statute known as the Louisiana Fair Trade Act which, unlike the one here, gives recognition to what is termed a fair trade contract and serves to protect trade-mark owners and the public against injurious practices in the distribution of commodities.
Mills v. City of Baton Rouge 28 So. 2d 447 La. 1946
47 ; Pepsodent Co. v. Krauss Co., Ltd. (International Cellucotton Producers Co. v. Same), , ; Curatorship of Parks, 210 La.
Curatorship of Parks 26 So. 2d 289 La. 1946
“ * * * Courts will construe a statute so as to accomplish the purpose for which it was enacted and to give effect to the legislative will.” Pepsodent Co. v. Krauss Co. (International Cellucotton Producers Co. v. Krauss Co., Ltd.), , 9 So.