DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Peck v. City of New Orleans, 5 So. 2d 508.

28 citing documents.

  • Louisiana Federation of Teachers v. State 118 So. 3d 1033 La. 2013
    *1068 76 , (1941); see also Wall, 14 So.2d at 26 (We “examine the title and body of Act 111 of 1942 in order to ascertain the purpose or aim of the statute.”).
  • Polk v. Edwards 626 So. 2d 1128 La. 1993
    (1941) (statute authorized voting machines in 63 parishes but mandated their use in Orleans Parish only); Knapp v. Jefferson-Plaquemines Drainage Dist., 224 La.
  • Nomey v. State 315 So. 2d 709 La. 1975
    The special character of those provisions of Act 41 , (1941).
  • Louisiana Independent Auto Dealers Ass'n v. State 295 So. 2d 796 La. 1974
    (1941), it was stated: "* * * The pronouncements of this court are legion to the effect that the provisions in the body of a law, which are germane to the object of the legislation need not be expressed in the title and that the title is not required to be a complete index to every section of the statute
  • State v. Sliger 261 So. 2d 643 La. 1972
    It further observed that “whatever is germane and incidental to the purpose may be set out in the title, but if the body of the act embraces cognate matter not strictly within the text of the title, such matter will, nevertheless, be covered by the title.” , (1941): “ * * * The pronouncements of this court are legion to the effect that the provisions in the body of a law, which are germane to the object of the legislation need not be expressed in the title and that the title is not required to b
  • Parish of Jefferson v. Louisiana Department of Corrections 254 So. 2d 582 La. 1971
    In Ricks, after citing and quoting numerous authorities, [7] we quoted with approval *590 , , 516: "It is the well-settled jurisprudence of this State that, where an Act contains more than one object and only one of those objects is expressed or indicated by the title, the entire statute will not be held unconstitutional on that score unless the object, which is not expressed in the title, is s
  • State v. O'Dell 218 So. 2d 318 La. 1969
  • Buras v. Orleans Parish Democratic Executive Committee 177 So. 2d 576 La. 1965
  • JEFFERSON PAR. SCH. BD. v. Jefferson Par. Dem. Ex. Com. 163 So. 2d 348 La. 1964
  • Jefferson Parish School Board v. Jefferson Parish Democratic Executive Committee 163 So. 2d 348 La. 1964
  • Mendel v. Gennaro 154 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    2d 527 ; , ; Williams v. Guerre, 182 La.
  • Plebst v. Barnwell Drilling Company 148 So. 2d 584 La. 1963
    125 , which, , , are cited in support of the text.
  • Terrebonne Parish School Board v. St. Mary Parish School Board 138 So. 2d 104 La. 1961
    Peck v. Tugwell, 199 La.
  • Criticized Tritico v. Board of Commissioners 134 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    521 the Supreme Court criticizes its previous holding in Fontenot v. Young, 128 La.
  • STATE EX REL. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS v. Bergeron 106 So. 2d 295 La. 1958
    220 ; , ; Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service, 200 La.
  • State v. Verret 87 So. 2d 297 La. 1956
    36 ; , ; Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service, 200 La.
  • Jones v. City of Lake Charles 80 So. 2d 411 La. 1955
    This election was governed by R.S.
  • Succession of GAMBINO 73 So. 2d 800 La. 1954
    982 , ; , ; Stewart v. Stanley, 199 La.
  • Webb v. Parish Council of Parish 47 So. 2d 718 La. 1950
    For instance, , , this court in construing Section 7 of Article 8 of the Constitution of this state construed the word “elections” in the clause “In all elections by the people the electorate shall vote by ballot * * * ” to mean all elections, primary and otherwise, and not just general elections.
  • Roberts v. Caddo Parish School Board 34 So. 2d 916 La. 1948
    220 ; , ; and State v. Pete, 206 La.
  • Woulfe v. Morrison 34 So. 2d 251 La. 1947
  • Kellogg v. Mertens 30 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    This general rule has been supported by pronouncements of the court even in cases in which the right to an injunction was denied, such as Moss v. Burke Trotti, Inc., , ; Meyer v. Kemper Ice Co., Inc., 180 La.
  • Bethlehem Supply Co. v. Pan-Southern Petroleum Corp. 20 So. 2d 737 La. 1944
    781 ; , ; Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service, 200 La.
  • Carso v. Board of Liquidation of State Debt 17 So. 2d 358 La. 1944
    Its withdrawal from the state treasury is prohibited by the Constitution, ‘except in pursuance of specific appropriation made by law.’ Const. 1921 art. 4, § 1.” In a very recent case, , , this court had occasion to consider the prohibition in Section 1 of Article IV of the Constitution against giving an administrative board authority to expend a part of the State’s general fund without a specific appropriation being made by the Legislature.
  • Wall v. Close 14 So. 2d 19 La. 1943
    In Peck v. City of New Orleans, 1941, , (McCaleb, J.), one of the questions involved was whether Act 84 of 1940, which provides for the use of voting machines in elections, was constitutional.
  • Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service 8 So. 2d 49 La. 1942
    It is sufficient if the title in general terms directs attention to the purpose of the enactment.” , .
  • Peck v. Tugwell 5 So. 2d 524 La. 1941
  • Stewart v. Stanley 5 So. 2d 531 La. 1941
    61 , , , this day decided.