Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gerald v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, 16 So. 2d 233.

41 citing documents.

McCann v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 276 So. 2d 259 La. 1973
In *262 , (1943), for example, we held the doctrine applicable to a fact structure presenting three defendants.
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Town of Ville Platte 269 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
App. 1 Cir. 1960) , (1943), gasoline fumes were ignited.
American Employers' Insurance Co. v. Fagot 250 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
288 , ; , ; American Home Insurance Co. v. A. J. Warehouse, La.App., .
Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co. 245 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1943) fumes from a tank truck delivering gas collected in a room nearby and exploded.
O'Reilly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 230 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, , ; Lykiardopoulo v. New Orleans & C. R. Light & Power Co., 127 La.
JC Trahan Drilling Contractor, Inc. v. Cockrell 225 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
West v. Hydro-Test, Inc. 196 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Day v. National U. S. Radiator Corporation, supra, , .
Brechtel v. Gulf States Elevator Corporation 195 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Geismar v. General Gas Corp. 182 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Hake v. Air Reduction Sales Co., 210 La.
Murphy Corporation v. Petrochem Maintenance, Inc. 180 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Hebert v. Valenti 179 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Tarbox v. Eason 179 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
145 , , 3 A.L.R.2d 1437 ]; , .
James v. Childs, Division of Kroger Company 166 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
2d 704 , 3 A.L.R.2d 1437 ; , ; Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 Louisiana Law Review 70, 92.
Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 158 So. 2d 162 La. 1963
145 , , 3 A.L.R.2d 1437 ; , ; Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 Louisiana Law Review 70, 92.
Vogt v. Hotard 144 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
145 , , 3 A.L.R.2d 1437 ; , ; Loprestie v. Roy Motors, Inc., 191 La.
Day v. National US Radiator Corporation 128 So. 2d 660 La. 1961
Hake v. Air Reduction Sales Co., 210 La.
Bauer v. Columbia Casualty Company 126 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Plunkett v. United Electric Service, supra; , ; Talbert v. Tyler, supra; Shields v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, supra.
Dowden v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance Company 124 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana et al., , .
Great American Indemnity Company v. Ford 122 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, , ; Lykiardopoulo v. New Orleans & C. R. Light & Power Co., 127 La.
Shields v. United Gas Pipe Line Company 110 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Plunkett v. United Electric Service, supra; , .
Baxter v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. 102 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Gillis v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 95 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
145 , , 3 A.L.R.2d 1437 ; , .
McCullin v. State 94 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Harris v. Varnado 94 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Hawayek v. Simmons 91 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
145 , , 3 A.L. R.2d 1437; , ; Loprestie v. Roy Motors, Inc., 191 La.
Saunders v. Walker 86 So. 2d 89 La. 1956
Talley v. Brock Furniture Co. 81 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Hamiter v. Duncan 78 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Northwestern Mutual Fire Association v. Allain 77 So. 2d 395 La. 1954
599 , ; , ; Hake v. Air Reduction Sales Co., 210 La.
Carter v. Middleton 76 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
1 , ; , ; Roy v. Louisiana State Department of Agriculture & Immigration, 216 La.
Leigh v. Johnson-Evans Motors 75 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
Burdett v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. 72 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
the Supreme Court said: “Res ipsa loquitur is often found to be appropriate in cases involving explosions.
Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. 61 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
We think that our Supreme Court clearly recognized this when, , , in which there were three defendants, the court said: "* * * The controversy is one in which the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is possible of application; * * *".
Bush v. Bookter 47 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Plunkett v. United Electrical Service, 214 La.
Landry v. News-Star-World Pub. Corp. 46 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Lockwood v. Kennedy, La.App., ; Ross v. Tynes et al., La.App., ; Gerald v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, Inc., , ; Welcek v. Saenger Theaters Corp., Inc., La.App., .
Lejeune v. Collard 44 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
v. Standard Oil Company of Louisiana, 1934, , .
Roy v. Louisiana State Department of Agriculture & Immigration 44 So. 2d 822 La. 1950
Dollar v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co. 37 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Counsel for plaintiffs takes the position that exceptions of no right and no cause of action are properly sustained only in those cases where plaintiff by the allegations of his petition evidences his guilt of contributory negligence, , .
International Paper v. Arkansas Louisiana M.R. Co. 35 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
v. Standard Oil Company of Louisiana, et al., , .
Hake v. Air Reduction Sales Co. 28 So. 2d 441 La. 1946
West v. Ray 26 So. 2d 221 La. 1946