Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land Fur Co., 17 So. 2d 827.

15 citing documents.

Ridge Oak Development, Inc. v. Murphy 641 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
852 (1930); Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., Inc., , (1944); (La.
TL James & Co. v. Kenner Landing, Inc. 562 So. 2d 914 La. 1990
1102 , (1966) (Permission given by father for son to use road, thus father could not bring action in trespass against those who had obtained the son's consent to use the same road); compare Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., , (1944) (In action for trespass on land for value of clam shells removed therefrom, in the absence of bad faith, landowner is only entitled to recover the value of the clam shells occurring in their natural state) with State v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining C
Succession of Kemp v. Robertson 316 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Sanders DeHart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., , .
Gallo v. Sorci 221 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Amite Gravel & Sand Company v. Roseland Gravel Company, 148 La.
Humble v. Dewey 215 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
346 (1887); Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., , (1944); Succ.
Gray v. State, Through Department of Highways 191 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
DeHart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., , ; Amite Gravel & Sand Co. v. Roseland Gravel Co., 148 La.
Woods v. Slocum 179 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Amite Gravel & Sand Company v. Roseland Gravel Company, 148 La.
East v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation 168 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
684 , ); or (2) the value of that part of the surface of the land which was utilized (Greenberg v. New Orleans Public Services, Inc., ); or (3) the value in place of the materials excavated (DeHart v. Continental Land & Fur Company, , ); or (4) the difference between the market value of the plaintiffs' 38-acre tract before defendant built the road fill and its value after the construction work had been completed (citing McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Company, 184 La.
Noel v. Jumonville Pipe and MacHinery Company 158 So. 2d 179 La. 1963
Sanders DeHart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., , ; Lee v. Jones, 224 La.
Succession of Seals 150 So. 2d 13 La. 1963
523 .” Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., , .
Coleman v. Chandler 136 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
(See Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Company, , ).
Rube v. Pacific Insurance Company of New York 131 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Warren v. Police Jury of Washington Parish, La.App., ; Sanders DeHart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., , ; Galiano v. Galiano, 213 La.
Rotolo v. Stewart 127 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
See also Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., Inc., , .
Banks v. Kent Piling Co. 87 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Supreme Court in Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., , , in considering an estoppel as applicable to the defendants stated: “The defendants cannot now change their position to the detriment of the other DeHart heirs by claiming the other DeHart heirs have not accepted the successions.
Hartsfield v. Green 62 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
In Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Company, Inc., 1944, , , such a contention was disposed of in this language: “Estoppel was not pleaded by the plaintiffs, but there was no need for the plaintiffs to interpose such a plea for the reason that the defendants' contention was first raised in their answer.