DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., 23 So. 2d 409.

37 citing documents.

  • Locker v. Wilson 536 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., , (1945).
  • Romero v. Mosquito Control Contractors, Inc. 480 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    625 , ; American Guaranty Company v. Sunset Realty & Planning Company, , ; Collins v. Huck, 161 La.
  • O'Neal v. Board of Regents of Higher Education 437 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2nd Cir.1961); American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty and Planting Co., Inc., , (1945).
  • Lacour v. Crais 367 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Jackson v. Fontenot Building, Inc. 314 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    1972); American *521 Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., , (1945); and, the authorities therein cited.
  • Osborn v. Johnston 308 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    4 Cir. 1966); American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., , (1945); Wheadon v. Turregano, 112 La.
  • Faris v. Model's Guild 297 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
  • Smith v. Everett 291 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    See American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., , (1945).
  • All State Credit Plan, Oak, Inc. v. Boucher 293 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    For Louisiana cases holding that a material alteration precludes recovery on a note against a party who did not assent to the alteration, see American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., , ; Watts v. Brooks, La.App., 1 Cir., and cases cited therein; Simmons v. Green, 2 Cir., 18 La.App.492, 138 So.
  • Parker v. Rhodes 260 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
    686 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , .
  • Fedele v. St. Romain 242 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    686 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , .
  • Ledoux v. Old Republic Life Insurance Company 233 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    625 , ; American Guaranty Company v. Sunset Realty & Planning Company, , ; Collins v. Huck, 161 La.
  • Alexander v. Alexander 233 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    686 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , .
  • Thompson v. Taylor 192 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    For Louisiana cases holding that a material alteration precludes recovery on a note against a party who did not assent to the alteration, see American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planning Co., , 23 So.
  • Stewart v. Schmauss 191 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Lacour v. Ford Investment Corp. 183 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1966
    Compare American Guaranty Company v. Sunset Realty & Planting Company, , (1944) with Munn v. Hoyt, 150 La.
  • Williams v. Morgan 180 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    We are entirely in accord with the legal principles enunciated by our Supreme Court in American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., , , which is strongly relied on by counsel for defendants.
  • Estate of Derouen v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. 150 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    625 , ; American Guaranty Company v. Sunset Realty & Planting Company, , ; Mitchell v. Alamis Co., La.App., ; Jeffrey Motor Company v. Higgins, 230 La.
  • Willis v. Gordon 143 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    62 , .” Again the Supreme Court in American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., , , said: “With reference to the extent of the burden of proof on a plaintiff in this type of case, it is well settled that fraud is not presumed.
  • Collier v. Administrator, Succession of Blevins 136 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    62 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , ; Belcher v. Booth, 164 La.
  • Home Finance Service of Lafayette Parish, Inc. v. Black 131 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Gross v. Brooks 130 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    686 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , .
  • Newell v. Rountree Olds-Cadillac Co. 129 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    686 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & *601 Planting Co., Inc., , .
  • Johnston v. Bearden 127 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    686 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , .
  • Mims v. Hilliard 125 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    861 ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Company, , .
  • Francis v. Bartlett 121 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co. et al., , ; Fred G. Jones & Co. v. Sanford, 163 La.
  • Garcia v. Dulcich 111 So. 2d 309 La. 1959
    686 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , .
  • Williams v. Cormier 100 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Art. 2276; cf., American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., , ; Accounts Supervision Co. v. Atley, La.App.
  • McClatchey v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Company 85 So. 2d 6 La. 1955
    686 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , .
  • Pierce v. Roussel 79 So. 2d 567 La. 1955
    Appellant argues that Roussel knew this statement was false, and that accordingly the' decision of this court in American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., So.2d 409, 449 , is authority for annulling the deed in the instant case.
  • Carpenter v. Skinner 71 So. 2d 133 La. 1954
    34 ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , ; McDade v. Green, La.App., 157 So.
  • Succession of Nelson 70 So. 2d 665 La. 1953
    861 ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., , ; Sanders v. Sanders, 222 La.
  • Buxton v. McKendrick 64 So. 2d 844 La. 1953
    “This doctrine is set forth by our Supreme Court in the case of American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., [ ] .
  • Marshall v. Lyles 62 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset R. & P. Co., , , one of the cases relied upon by plaintiff, involved false representations by which the plaintiff in that case was induced to sign quitclaim deeds to land in Louisiana which was very valuable for oil and gas, for a very nominal sum.
  • Sanders v. Sanders 62 So. 2d 284 La. 1952
    686 , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., , .
  • Overby v. Beach 55 So. 2d 873 La. 1951
    In a supplemental brief, filed after this opinion was prepared, plaintiff's counsel relies on and discusses American Guaranty Company v. Sunset Realty & Planting Company, Inc., et al., , , in which the two quitclaim deeds were set aside on the ground of concealment of material facts regarding the value of the land involved.
  • Woodward v. Barringer 24 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    549 ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty and Planting Co., Inc., et al., ; McIntire et al. v. Pryor, 173 U.S. 38 , 19 S.Ct.