Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Angelle v. State, 34 So. 2d 321.

43 citing documents.

Holzenthal v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
(1948), a disinfection spraying program allegedly caused a fire that destroyed the plaintiffs property.
Holzenthal v. SEWERAGE & WATER BD. OF NO 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
(1948), a disinfection spraying program allegedly caused a fire that destroyed the plaintiff's property.
Dan Rhodes Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Moreover, So.2d 321, 323, 29 A.L.R.2d 666 [(1948)], it was held that the constitutional provisions prohibiting the taking or damaging of private property, except for public purposes, refers exclusively to the power of eminent domain, that is, the intentional or purposeful expropriatio
DAN RHODES ENTER v. City of Lake Charles 857 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Moreover, , 29 [2] A.L.R.2d 666 [(1948)], it was held that the constitutional provisions prohibiting the taking or damaging of private property, except for public purposes, refers exclusively to the power of eminent domain, that is, the intentional or purposeful expropriation or appropriation of private prope
Vogt v. BD. OF COM'RS ORLEANS LEVEE DIST. 814 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Vogt v. Board of Commissioners 814 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 738 So. 2d 544 La. 1999
Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 708 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Obermier v. State 606 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
(1948), the Louisiana Supreme Court was faced with a question similar to the one before us. The plaintiffs sued the state for the value of a crop destroyed by a fire inadvertently started by employees of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while they were spraying crops for insects.
Naquin v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. OF STATE 604 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Dickie's Sportsman's Centers, Inc. v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 477 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
(1948); writs refused, 247 La.
Callais Cablevision, Inc. v. Houma Cablevision, Inc. 451 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
849 , (1972); , (1948); (La.App.
Oswalt v. Irby Const. Co. 424 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. Pitcher 361 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Orleans Parish School Board v. Williams 312 So. 2d 647 La. 1975
436 , 185 S.E.2d 908 (1971); , (1948).
Mouledous v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 281 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
3rd Cir. 1967); , (1948); Aleman v. Sewerage & Water Board, 196 La.
Perkins v. Simon 265 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Compass v. Department of Highways 224 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
We said in Klein that we could not reconcile our views with those of the Second Circuit in Kendall v. State, Through Department of Highways, La.App., (1964), , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 (1948), and held that plaintiff’s action could not be brought under LSA-Const.
Reymond v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 217 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
The rule of the Kendall case, however, , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 , which requires “ * * * the intentional or purposeful expropriation or appropriation of private property for a public use or convenience” for the application of Article 1 § 2 of the Constitution of the State of Louisiana, that is the provision relates solely to cases of eminent domain.
Columbia Gulf Transmission Company v. Hoyt 215 So. 2d 114 La. 1968
Gray v. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways 202 So. 2d 24 La. 1967
Distinguished Florsheim v. Department of Highways 201 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
Cited in support of this contention are: , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 (1948); Miller v. Colonial Pipeline Company, 173 *
State, Department of Highways v. Mouledous 199 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
2 A.L.R.2d 666 ; Aleman v. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, 196 La.
Gray v. State, Through Department of Highways 191 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
2 A.L.R.2d 666 ; Marie v. Police Jury of Terrebonne Parish, La.App.
Veillon v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Company 192 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
spite of the careful precautions taken by the State in the Gray case, the majority in that suit held that the State was liable in damages for illegal trespass, while in the instant suit, where no attempt was made to expropriate or to obtain judicial authority to take the land, we apply the established law as set out in Article 1, Section 2, of the Louisiana Constitution, , ; Harrison v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 191 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McGill 191 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
[ 2 A.L.R.2d 666 ], and felt bound by the provisions of that decision rather than by the decision in the Kendall case.
Petrovich v. State 181 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
2 A.L.R.2d 666 (1948); Bernard v. State, La.App., (1961); Cousin v. Hornsby, La.App., (1st C. of A. 1956); Louisiana Highway Commission v. Israel, 205 La.
Miller v. Colonial Pipeline Company 173 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Klein v. Department of Highways 175 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
[2] , at pp. 323-324 , 2 A.L.R.
Marie v. Police Jury of Parish of Terrebonne 161 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
See Article 3, Section 35, Louisiana State Constitution; , , [ 2 A.L.R.
Poirier v. T. L. James & Co. 163 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1964
Jarnagin v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ; and cases therein cited; Angelle v. State, Dept. of Public Works, , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 ; Bernard v. State *174 Dept. of Public Works, La.App., ; Williams v. Department of Highways, La.App., .
Derbofen v. TL James & Company 148 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
2 A.L.R.2d 666 , and cases cited therein.
Bernard v. State 127 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
2 A.L.R.2d 666 ; Scorsune v. State, 224 La.
Duree v. Maryland Casualty Company 114 So. 2d 594 La. 1959
* * * ” Again, , [ 2 A.L.R.2d 666 ], we observed: “A reading of the petitions in the instant cases makes manifest that the causes of action are founded on the negligence of the Department of Agriculture * * *.
Cheshire v. City of Minden 83 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Moreover, , , 29 A.L.R.2d 666 , it was held that the constitutional provisions prohibiting the taking or damaging of private property, except for public purposes, refers exclusively to the power of eminent domain, that is, the intentional or purposeful expropriation or appropriation of private property for a p
Marler v. State 78 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
2 A.L.R.2d 666 , cited by the defendant, does not support the State's contention but rather that of the plaintiff.
Beck v. Boh Bros. Const. Co. 72 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
The averment that the constitutional provision which is relied on makes the Sewerage & Water Board liable whenever its operations cause damage is, we think, , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 .
Hebert v. TL James & Co. 72 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Long v. Northeast Soil Conservation Dist. of La. 72 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
742 , , , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 .
Scorsune v. State 71 So. 2d 557 La. 1954
Prunty v. City of Shreveport 66 So. 2d 3 La. 1953
In this connection, , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 .
Orleans Parish School Board v. City of New Orleans 56 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
135 (Court of Appeal-Orleans); , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 ; Coguenham v. Drainage District, 130 La.
Roy v. Louisiana State Department of Agriculture & Immigration 44 So. 2d 822 La. 1950
Angelle et al. v. State 1948, , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 .