Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Doran v. Doran, 39 So. 2d 894.
- State v. Armstrong 683 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Brown 514 So. 2d 99 La. 1987
-
State v. Benoit
440 So. 2d 129
La. 1983
(1949), this court adopted the prevailing federal rule that where a witness voluntarily takes the stand for the purpose of testifying as to one issue only, he cannot, under cross-examination, be made to testify against his will concerning matters that are *133 totally unrelated to that issue.
-
State v. Johnson
432 So. 2d 815
La. 1983
(1949); Hart v. Picou, 147 La.
- State v. Knowles 395 So. 2d 678 La. 1981
- State v. Lovett 345 So. 2d 1139 La. 1977
-
State v. Bolen
338 So. 2d 97
La. 1976
(1949), this court held: ".
- State v. Didier 254 So. 2d 262 La. 1971
-
Hays v. Hays
227 So. 2d 155
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Doran v. Doran, et al., , .
- State ex rel. Collins v. Collins 111 So. 2d 306 La. 1959
- State ex rel. Collins v. Collins 110 So. 2d 545 La. 1959
-
State v. Ford
99 So. 2d 320
La. 1957
Doran v. Doran, supra, [ , ].” These defendants were not indicted nor charged by the Federal authorities, while in the Dominguez case, supra, not only was the defendant charged, but there were twelve counts in one indictment preferred against him and returned by the Grand Jury to the Federal District Court for the Eastern Di
- State ex rel. Ingram v. Robard 82 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
- State v. Dominguez 82 So. 2d 12 La. 1955