DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., 198 So. 516.

16 citing documents.

  • Aucoin v. Fidelity General Insurance Company 219 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    516 , , and Rector v. Allied Van Line, La.App., 2nd Cir., .
  • Molero v. Bass 190 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
  • Thibodeaux v. Jack's Cookie Corp. 171 So. 2d 479 La. 1965
  • Bryant v. X-L Finance Co. 166 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    holds as follows: “ * * * Incidently, we are unable to review the decree of the district court in each case overruling the above-mentioned declinatory exceptions, as defense counsel request us to do, because it is not such a decree that would sustain an appeal.
  • Lewis v. Quebedeaux 134 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    See Rector v. Allied Van Lines, La.App., .
  • Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 133 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    See also Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., La.App., ; Penton v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, La.App., ; Bernstein v. Cathey and Carrell Truck Lines, La.
  • Brown v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance 116 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
  • Franklin v. Holomon 110 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    2 Cir., , cer-tiorari denied, where the sleeping driver and passengers of a car parked after dark protruding upon a highway recovered for their injuries because the driver of the truck which struck them had the last clear chance to avoid the accident; see also: Alvares v. Rush, La.App.
  • Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Company 102 So. 2d 451 La. 1958
    See also Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., La.App., ; Penton v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, La.App., ; Bernstein v. Cathey and Carrell Truck Lines, La.App., and Rachal v. Balthazar, La.App., .
  • De Lee v. Price 94 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    App. 2 Cir., , Robinson v. Enloe, 2 Cir., 10 La.App.
  • Brooks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 91 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    In Rector v. Allied Van Lines, La.App., , this court, in an opinion of Mr. Justice Hamiter, who was then a member, made a significant comparison of the conduct of two drivers, one of whom, by proper observation, was able to avoid a collision, while the other, inattentive to his duty of watching the road, was found negligent in colliding with another vehicle
  • Howard v. Howard 90 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    320 ; Rector v. Allied Van Lines, La.App., .
  • Kennison v. Durbin 82 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    “Pertinent decisions setting forth the duty of the operator of a motor vehicle where weather conditions have limited visibility are: Rector v. Allied Van Lines [La.App.], ; Hogue v. Akin Truck Line [La.App.], ; Giorlando v. Maitrejean [La.App.], .
  • Hogg v. Department of Highways of the State 80 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., La.App.1940, , 519 is cited in support.
  • Hogue v. Akin Truck Line 16 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    201 ; Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., et al., La.App., .
  • Penton v. Sears, Roebuck Co. 4 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    See Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., et al., La.App., , and Roberson v. Rodriguez et al., La.App., 186 So.