Nos. 94-CA-1609 through 94-CA-1611
Precedential
Processed
Stockstill v. Rousselle
Stockstill v. Rousselle, 641 So. 2d 724 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994).
Cited by
- Cunningham v. Marullo 150 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- Steinhardt v. Batt 753 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- Cook v. Skipper 749 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Opinion text
| xWARD, Judge, concurring. Defendants contend that the charter change, if applied to them retroactively, would deprive them of vested rights to qualify for an office. This argument is not persuasive. There are no vested rights to qualify for an office defendants are barred from holding if they are elected.