Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hy-Octane Investments, Ltd. v. G & B OIL PROD., INC., 702 So. 2d 1057.

32 citing documents.

225 Baronne Complex, LLC v. Roy Anderson Corp. and the Honorable Chelsey R. Napoleon, in Her Capacity as … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 3 Cir. 10/29/97), ).
Kraig T. Strenge v. Abc Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Lesa G. Gamble v. Denny E. Gamble, Jr. La. 2022
Billye Dickson Johnson v. Natchitoches Community Improvement Foundation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
The Umbrella Investment Group, L.L.C., Lawrence Q. Robertson, Micco D. Johnson, Jarmarritt Alexis, Eugene Pierre Steib, Valvenia R. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 3 Cir. 10/ 29/ 97), internal citations omitted).
Marco Outdoor Advertising, Inc. Versus Kfk Group, Inc. and Pelican Outdoor Advertising, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Patten/Jenkins BR Popeyes, L.L.C. v. SRG Baton Rouge II, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
App. 3" Cir. 10/ 29/ 97), ( internal citations omitted).
Thomas Handy, Jr. Versus The Parish of Jefferson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
An Erny Girl, L.L.C. v. BCNO 4 L.L.C. 216 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 10/29/97), ) (addressing extensively the meaning of the phrase “transaction or occurrence”).
Parker v. Tulane-Loyola Federal Credit Union 193 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 10/29/97), , pointed out that seven oí the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure articles use the "phrase — La.
First Bank & Trust v. Simmons 165 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015
Black v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 165 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
Krecek v. Dick 136 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
Succession of Frank Bernat La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Succession of Bernat 123 So. 3d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Zen-Noh Grain Corp. v. Thompson 123 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 10/29/97) , , as follows: The term “transaction or occurrence” is used in seven articles of the Code of *779 Civil Procedure.
727 Toulouse, L.L.C. v. Bistro at Maison De Ville, L.L.C. 122 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 10/29/97) , , this court discussed an exception of lis pendens that *?
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. Smith 71 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Travcal Properties, LLC, Etc. v. Gregory J. Logan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Travcal Properties, LLC v. Logan 49 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Midland Funding LLC v. Burthlong 20 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 10/29/97), , stated: “It makes no difference for a compulsory re-conventional demand by a defendant if there are additional parties involved.
Coury Moss, Inc. v. A. Sam Coury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 10/29/97), citing Comment (a) to La.
Coury Moss, Inc. v. Coury 981 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 10/29/97), , citing Comment (a) to La.
Classen v. Hofmann 947 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
North Amer. Treat. Sys. v. Scottsdale Ins. 943 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3rd Cir.10/29/97), , the court was confronted with the meaning of "transaction or occurrence" in the context of determining an exception of lis pendens raising the issue of whether a reconventional demand was compulsory under La.
Revel v. Charamie 926 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 10/29/97), , citing Comment (a) to La.
Blanchard v. ABC Ins. Co. 867 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
3d Cir.10/29/97), , the third circuit examined the meaning of "transaction or occurrence" as used in seven articles of the Code of Civil Procedure and La.
Wells v. Standard Mortgage Corp. 865 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 10/29/97), , citing Comment (a) to La.
Glass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 832 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 10/29/97) , , which is worth quoting at some length: The doctrine of res judicata was substantially changed by La.
Long v. Minton 809 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 10/29/97) , , this court discussed an exception of lis pendens that was premised on the compulsory reconventional demand theory.
Glod v. Baker 755 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 10/29/97) ; , discussed the meaning of the term "transaction or occurrence" as it concerns the doctrine of res judicata.
G & B Oil Products, Inc. v. Hy-Octane Investments, Ltd. 702 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 10/29/97), , the application is DENIED.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by