Pamela Bordelon v. Paragon Casino and Resort
Pamela Bordelon v. Paragon Casino and Resort, No. WCA-0003-1223 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Mar. 3, 2004).
The holding in the court’s own words
After reviewing the law and the evidence, we conclude that the issue in this matter is essentially identical to that raised in our recent decision of Ortego v. Tunica Biloxi Indians of LA, d/b/a Paragon Casino, 03-1001 (La.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
03-1223
PAMELA BORDELON
VERSUS
TUNICA BILOXI INDIAN TRIBE OF LA,
d/b/a PARAGON CASINO AND RESORT
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION - # 2
PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 02-08904
JAMES L. BRADDOCK, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION JUDGE
**********
GLENN B. GREMILLION
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Jimmie C. Peters, Michael G. Sullivan, and Glenn B. Gremillion,
Judges.
AFFIRMED.
Jay Anthony Pucheu
P. O. Box 310
Marksville, LA 71351
(318) 253-5080
Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant
Pamela Bordelon
Anthony P. Palermo
Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson
P. O. Box 3197
Baton Rouge, LA 70821
(225) 387-4000
Counsel for Defendant/Appellee
Tunica Biloxi Indian Tribe of LA,
d/b/a Paragon Casino and Resort
GREMILLION, Judge.
The plaintiff, Pamela Bordelon, appeals the judgment of the workers’
compensation judge granting an exception of subject matter jurisdiction in favor of
the defendant, Tunica Biloxi Indian Tribe of LA, d/b/a Paragon Casino and Resort,
dismissing her workers’ compensation claim with prejudice. Tunica Biloxi filed the
exception claiming that it was immune from suit in the Louisiana Department of
Labor, Office of Workers’ Compensation, due to its sovereign status as an Indian
nation.
After reviewing the law and the evidence, we conclude that the issue in
this matter is essentially identical to that raised in our recent decision of Ortego v.
Tunica Biloxi Indians of LA, d/b/a Paragon Casino, 03-1001 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/4/04),
So.2d . Finding our opinion in Ortego controlling, we affirm the dismissal of
Bordelon’s suit.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the workers’ compensation
judge granting Tunica Biloxi’s exception of lack of subject matter jurisdiction is
affirmed. The costs of this matter are assessed to the plaintiff-appellant, Pamela
Bordelon.