Antonio G. Rodriguez v. Integrity Contracting
Antonio G. Rodriguez v. Integrity Contracting, No. WCA-0006-0766 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Aug. 30, 2006).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
06-766
Consolidated with 06-960 and 06-961
ANTONIO G. RODRIGUEZ
VERSUS
INTEGRITY CONTRACTING, ET AL.
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION
DISTRICT FOUR, NO. 04-01827,
HONORABLE SHARON MORROW, JUDGE
**********
OSWALD A. DECUIR
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Sylvia R. Cooks, Oswald A. Decuir, and Jimmie C. Peters,
Judges.
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL GRANTED.
Janice Barber
The Janice H. Barber Law Corporation
505 Loire Avenue, Suite A
Lafayette, LA 70507
(337) 896-5420
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE:
Antonio Rodriguez
Robert Martina
Gallow & Jeffcoat, L.L.P.
Post Office Box 61550
Lafayette, LA 70596
(337) 984-8020
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE:
Integrity Contracting
Deborah E. Lamb
Taylor, Porter, Brooks & Phillips
Post Office Box 2471
Baton Rouge, LA 70821
(225) 387-3221
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT:
Louisiana Worker’s Compensation Corporation
Kirk Landry
Keogh, Cox & Wilson, Ltd.
Post Office Box 1151
Baton Rouge, LA 70821
(225) 383-3796
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE:
Vaughan Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc.
Sylvia Fordice
Louisiana Department of Justice
556 Jefferson Street, 4th floor
Lafayette, LA 70501
(337) 262-1700
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana
DECUIR, Judge.
The defendant-appellee, Vaughan Roofing and Sheet Metal, Inc., moves
to dismiss the appeal of the Louisiana Worker’s Compensation Corporation
because it was taken from a non-appealable judgment. For the reasons stated
below, we grant the appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal.
This is a consolidated worker’s compensation case wherein Antonio
Garcia Rodriguez filed claims against his alleged employers, Integrity
Contracting; Vaughan Roofing and Sheet Metal, Inc.; and the State of
Louisiana, and against the Louisiana Worker’s Compensation Corporation
(LWCC). Vaughan Roofing filed a third-party demand for indemnification
against LWCC.
Trial was originally set for October 27, 2005. However, on October 28,
2005, the trial court issued a minute entry continuing trial and stating that trial
would be held separately on the insurance coverage issues and the remaining
issues. Following a severed trial consisting of the insurance coverage issues,
the worker’s compensation court issued a judgment finding that the LWCC
had an insurance policy covering Jason Stanton d/b/a Integrity Contracting on
the date of the claimant’s accident. The trial court signed the judgment on
February 7, 2006.
LWCC filed an appeal from this judgment on March 16, 2006. This
appeal was lodged with this court on June 13, 2006. The appellee’s motion
to dismiss appeal was filed on June 21, 2006.
We find the judgment appealed is not a judgment finding liability
between the parties in a bifurcated trial as authorized by La.Code Civ.P. art.
1562 nor is the judgment a partial final judgment provided for in La.Code
1
Civ.P. art. 1915. Therefore, this judgment is not a final, appealable judgment
pursuant to La.Code Civ.P. art. 2083. Accordingly, we dismiss the appellant’s
appeal at appellant’s cost.
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL GRANTED.
2