Angela Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., June 23, 2010
Angela Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc., No. WCA-0009-1424 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. May 5, 2010).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Romero v. Northrop-Grumman 787 So. 2d 1149
- Romero v. Northrop-Grumman Corp. 799 So. 2d 1144
- Frank v. Kent Guidry Farms 816 So. 2d 969
- Frank v. FARMS 847 So. 2d 1273
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
09-1424
ANGELA LEONARDS
VERSUS
CARMICHAEL’S CASHWAY PHARMACY, INC.
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, DISTRICT # 4
PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 07-5204
SAM L. LOWERY, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION JUDGE
**********
ELIZABETH A. PICKETT
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Sylvia R. Cooks, and
Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges.
AFFIRMED.
Michael B. Miller
Miller & Miller
P. O. Drawer 1630
Crowley, LA 70527-1630
Counsel for Claimant/Appellee:
Angela Leonards
Kristine Smiley
Tierney and Smiley, LLC
11606 Southfork Dr., Suite 104
Baton Rouge, LA 70816
Counsel for Defendant/Appellant:
Carmichael’s Cashway Pharmacy, Inc.
PICKETT, J.
SUMMARY DISPOSITION
The defendants, Carmichael’s Cashway Pharmacy and its insurer, Louisiana
Retail Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter jointly referred to as Carmichael’s),
appeal a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) awarding the claimant
a total of $8,000.00. The penalties were assessed for paying the wrong compensation
rate, for paying the “waiting week” late, for failure to timely pay a MRI bill, and for
failure to properly pay mileage for September 26, 2007. The defendants also appeal
the award to the claimant of $22,275.00 in attorney’s fees. The claimant answers the
appeal seeking additional attorney’s fees for work necessitated by this appeal. We
affirm the judgment of the WCJ and award the claimant an additional $3,000.00 in
attorney’s fees.
The issues of penalties and attorney’s fees have been addressed by this court
many times. In Romero v. Northrop-Grumman, 01-24, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3 Cir.
5/30/01), 787 So.2d 1149, 1155-56, writ denied, 01-1937 (La. 10/26/01), 799 So.2d
1144 (citations omitted), we stated:
The determination of whether an employer should be cast with
penalties and attorney fees is essentially a question of fact; we will not
reverse the WCJ’s finding on appeal absent evidence of manifest error.
Penalties and attorney fees are available to a claimant when his employer
does not provide workers’ compensation benefits as required by law.
. . . To avoid the imposition of penalties and attorney fees for the
nonpayment of benefits, the employer has a continuing obligation to
investigate, to assemble, and to assess factual information before denying
benefits. The determination of whether an employer has reasonably
controverted claims for the purpose of imposing penalties and attorney
fees depends on the facts known to the employer at the time of its
conduct. To reasonably controvert a claim so as not to be liable for
statutory penalties, the employer must have factual or medical
1
information of such a nature that it reasonably counters that provided by
the workers’ compensation claimant.
In this case, after hearing testimony, considering the evidence and hearing
argument of counsel, the WCJ found in favor of the claimant on all issues. We find
no error in this ruling.
As to the claimant’s answer to this appeal requesting additional attorney’s fees
for work necessitated by the appeal, we rely on a former opinion of this court wherein
we stated the following: “Because attorney fees were correctly awarded below, failing
to award increased attorney fees for the additional work required for this appeal would
be inconsistent with that judgment.” Frank v. Kent Guidry Farms, 01-727, p. 5
(La.App. 3 Cir. 5/8/02), 816 So.2d 969, 973, writ denied, 02-1608 (La. 6/27/03), 847
So.2d 1273. The claimant is awarded an additional $3,000.00 in attorney’s fees for
work done on this appeal.
Accordingly, the judgment of the WCJ is affirmed in accordance with Uniform
Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-16.2(5)-(8). The claimant is awarded an additional
$3,000.00 in attorney’s fees for work done on this appeal. All costs of this appeal are
taxed against the appellants, Carmichael’s Cashway Pharmacy and its insurer,
Louisiana Retail Mutual Insurance Company.
AFFIRMED.
2