Agilus Health (James Wilbanks) v. Dresser, Inc.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., November 17, 2010
Agilus Health (James Wilbanks) v. Dresser, Inc., No. WCA-0010-0315 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Apr. 14, 2010).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
10-315
AGILUS HEALTH (JAMES WILBANKS)
VERSUS
DRESSER, INC., ET AL.
************
APPEAL FROM THE
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, DISTRICT 02
PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 08-05823
JAMES L. BRADDOCK, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION JUDGE
************
DAVID E. CHATELAIN*
JUDGE
************
Court composed of Oswald A. Decuir, J. David Painter, and David E. Chatelain,
Judges.
MOTION TO DISMISS SUSPENSIVE APPEAL AND
CONVERT TO DEVOLUTIVE APPEAL DENIED.
Patrick A. Johnson
D. Paul Gardner, Jr.
Allen & Gooch
Post Office Box 81129
Lafayette, Louisiana 70598-1129
(337) 291-1430
Counsel for Defendants/Appellants:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Dresser, Inc.
*
Honorable David E. Chatelain participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana
Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore.
Edward R. Wicker, Jr.
Barrasso, Usdin, Kupperman, Freeman and Sarver
909 Poydras Street, Suite 1800
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
(504) 589-9700
Counsel for Defendants/Appellants:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Dresser, Inc.
Edward E. Roberts, III
Neblett, Beard & Arsenault
Post Office Box 1190
Alexandria, Louisiana 71309
(318) 487-9874
Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee:
Agilus Health
R. Bray Williams
Joseph Payne Williams, Sr.
Williams Family Law Firm, L.L.C.
Post Office Box 15
Natchitoches, Louisiana 71458-0015
(318) 352-6695
Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee:
Agilus Health
CHATELAIN, Judge.
The appellee, Agilus Health, Inc., moves to dismiss the suspensive appeal of
the appellants, Dresser, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and to convert
their appeal to a devolutive appeal. The appellee contends that the appellants posted
their suspensive appeal bond untimely. Finding that the posting of the bond was
timely in accordance with La.R.S. 23:1310.5, we deny the motion to dismiss.
Following trial of this matter, the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ)
rendered a money judgment against the appellants, finding that the appellee had been
underpaid by the appellants in the sum of $23.40 for health care bills associated with
a work-related injury to James Wilbanks. The WCJ also cast the appellants with a
$2,000.00 statutory penalty and with $3,000.00 in attorney fees.
The WCJ signed the written judgment on January 14, 2010. On this date, the
trial court mailed notice of this judgment to all counsel of record. No motion for new
trial was filed. The appellants filed their motion and order for appeal on February 4,
2010, and the order was granted by the WCJ that same date. Appellants also filed on
that date a Motion and Order to Set Bond for Suspensive Appeal, which order was
signed by the WCJ setting a hearing for February 8, 2010.
The hearing on the bond amount was conducted on February 8, 2010, at which
time the WCJ set the bond amount. On February 10, 2010, the WCJ signed an order
setting the bond amount at $5,352.00. The appellants posted the suspensive appeal
bond on March 2, 2010. The record was subsequently lodged in this court.
The appellee filed a motion to convert the appeal from suspensive to
devolutive, arguing that the appellants failed to post their suspensive appeal bond
within thirty days of notice of the final judgment, as provided in La.Code Civ.P.
1
2123. The appellants filed an opposition memorandum in this court, contending that
the suspensive appeal bond was timely posted within thirty days of the notice of the
setting of the bond’s amount as provided in La.R.S. 23:1310.5(C).
In a case involving substantially similar facts, this court has issued an opinion
on this date, finding that the posting of the suspensive appeal bond within thirty days
of the notice of the setting of the bond amount was timely. Agilus Health (Kenneth
McKeithen) v. Dresser, Inc., 10-313 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/14/10), ___ So.3d ___. For
those same reasons, we hereby deny the motion to dismiss the appellants’ suspensive
appeal.
MOTION TO DISMISS SUSPENSIVE APPEAL AND CONVERT TO
DEVOLUTIVE APPEAL DENIED.
2