Kirk Weldon v. Holiday Inn - Jennings
Kirk Weldon v. Holiday Inn - Jennings, No. WCA-0011-0203 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Oct. 5, 2011).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co. 885 So. 2d 562
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
11-203
KIRK WELDON
VERSUS
HOLIDAY INN - JENNINGS
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION - # 3
PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 04-06572
SAM L. LOWERY, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION JUDGE
**********
ELIZABETH A. PICKETT
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Elizabeth A. Pickett, Billy Howard Ezell, and Shannon J.
Gremillion, Judges.
REVERSED AND RENDERED.
H. Douglas Hunter
Guglielmo, Lopez, Tuttle, Hunter, & Jarrell, LLP
P. O. Drawer 1329
Opelousas, LA 70571-1329
(337) 948-8201
Counsel for Defendant-Appellant:
Holiday Inn - Jennings
Michael Benny Miller
Miller & Miller
P. O. Box 1630
Crowley, LA 70527-1630
(337) 785-9500
Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant:
Kirk Weldon
PICKETT, Judge.
Both the claimant, Kirk Weldon, and the employer, Holiday Inn – Jennings
appeal a judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation awarding Weldon
penalties and attorneys’ fees.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Kirk Weldon was injured while lifting a hot water heater in the course and
scope of his employment with Holiday Inn on February 6, 2004. On May 10,
2005, the parties entered a consent judgment into the record, which stated:
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
defendants pay weekly compensation benefits beginning February 7,
2004 in the amount of $266.55 per week, based upon an average
weekly wage of $399.82 ($384.62 plus $15.20 in fringe benefits).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
defendants will pay for the medication, Aciphex, and reasonable and
necessary medical treatment related to the injury of KIRK WELDON.
Defendants reserve the right to contest the connection of the hernia
with the accident.
On January 20, 2010, Weldon filed a Motion and Order for Penalties and
Attorneys’ Fees. Weldon asserted that Holiday Inn violated the consent judgment
by terminating weekly benefits, failing to approve and pay for a prescription for
Aciphex, and failing to reimburse Weldon properly for mileage to receive medical
treatment. A hearing on the motion was held on June 3, 2010. At the hearing,
Weldon, in addition to the issues raised in the motion, alleged that Holiday Inn
failed to pay medical bills from March 26, 2008, and he sought additional penalties
and attorneys’ fees.
Holiday Inn claimed it had the right to decrease Weldon’s compensation
because he earned over $27,000.00 from the sale of his stock in a barbecue sauce
company. It claimed they never terminated Weldon’s benefits, but it did admit to
decreasing the benefits to $400.00 per month. Holiday Inn argued that Weldon
1
could not produce the prescription for Aciphex that was not filled, so its failure to
pay had not been proven. On the issue of mileage reimbursement, it was clear that
Holiday Inn miscalculated the mileage reimbursement on one occasion and paid
the reimbursement four months after it was submitted on another occasion.
Finally, Holiday Inn argued that it did not pay the medical bills from March 2008
because they related to Weldon’s treatment for a hiatal hernia, which was
specifically not covered by the May 2005 judgment. Further, they argued that
those bills were incurred prior to a previous judgment awarding penalties and
attorneys’ fees, so res judicata barred those claims now.
The Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) entered oral reasons into the
record on October 4, 2010. The trial court found that Holiday Inn terminated
benefits in May 2010 and awarded $8,000.00 in penalties pursuant to La.R.S.
23:1201(I). The WCJ also found that Holiday Inn failed to pay for Aciphex and
“improperly or tardily paid for the medical mileage and medical bills.” Finding
that the $8,000.00 penalty was the maximum that he could award, though, he did
not award additional penalties. The WCJ also awarded attorneys’ fees of
$12,937.50 (fifty-seven and a half hours at $225 per hour).
Both parties now appeal the judgment of the WCJ.
ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR
In its appeal, Holiday Inn assigns two errors:
1. The trial court committed manifest error in awarding penalties in the
amount of $8,000.00 for termination of benefits.
2. The trial court committed manifest error in awarding an attorney fee
in the amount of $12,937.50.
Weldon asserts five assignments of error:
1. The Workers’ Compensation Judge erred in failing to allow the
payment ledger showing indemnity payments made into evidence.
2
2. The Workers’ Compensation Judge erred in failing to award penalties
due to the failure of defendants to properly pay weekly benefits.
3. The Workers’ Compensation Judge erred in failing to award penalties
for failure to guarantee and/or pay for medical benefits.
4. It was error for the Workers’ Compensation to fail to include expenses
in the judgment.
5. It was error for the Workers’ Compensation Judge to fail to include
legal interest on all amounts due in the judgment.
In addition, Weldon seeks attorneys’ fees for work done on this appeal.
DISCUSSION
Payment Ledger
We will begin by discussing the evidentiary issue raised by Weldon.
Weldon sought to introduce a ledger of payments from Holiday Inn received by his
attorney on his behalf. Holiday Inn objected to the introduction of the ledger,
prepared by Weldon’s attorney’s secretary, on the grounds that Weldon failed to
lay a proper foundation for the document. Weldon proffered the document and
now argues that the ledger should have been admitted. He claims that since the
check stubs are available and could have been admitted, the ledger is clearly
admissible. We disagree. A WCJ has the discretion to admit evidence that would
be inadmissible according to the Code of Evidence. La.R.S. 23:1317. We find
here that the WCJ did not abuse his discretion in denying the admission of the
ledger and in not considering the ledger in making his ruling. This assignment of
error lacks merit.
Penalty for Termination of Benefits
Holiday Inn argues that the WCJ erred in awarding an $8,000.00 penalty for
the termination of benefits pursuant to La.R.S. 23:1201(I). The record is clear that
Holiday Inn never terminated benefits to Weldon, though it did stipulate that it
3
reduced the benefits from $266.55 per week to $400.00 per month. Weldon, in
brief to this court, agrees that benefits were never terminated. The WCJ’s
determination was clearly erroneous. We reverse the judgment of the WCJ
awarding an $8,000.00 penalty to Weldon. As we find the penalty award
inappropriate, we also reverse the award of attorneys fees. As we have found that
the trial court committed manifest error and applied the incorrect law, we will
review the remainder of the issues de novo.
Failure to Pay Weekly Benefits
While Weldon does not seriously dispute that the award of an $8,000.00
penalty for discontinuance of benefits is improper, he does argue that the WCJ
erred in failing assess penalties against Holiday Inn for (1) paying benefits monthly
rather than weekly beginning in September 2009 and (2) reducing benefits to
$400.00 per month beginning in November 2009. Weldon argues that each of
these violations should result in a $3,000.00 penalty pursuant to La.R.S.
23:1201(G).
Holiday Inn argues that filing a Motion for Penalties and Attorney Fees is
the improper procedure to recover the fees. The claim they are authorized to
modify the payments agreed to under the consent judgment because the payments
were not for temporary total disability, citing La.R.S. 23:1310.8(F). We disagree.
It is clear from the record that Holiday Inn violated the May 10, 2005, judgment
when they stopped paying benefits weekly and began paying benefits monthly.
Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:1201(G) states:
If any award payable under the terms of a final, nonappealable
judgment is not paid within thirty days after it becomes due, there
shall be added to such award an amount equal to twenty-four percent
thereof or one hundred dollars per day together with reasonable
attorney fees, for each calendar day after thirty days it remains unpaid,
whichever is greater, which shall be paid at the same time as, and in
4
addition to, such award, unless such nonpayment results from
conditions over which the employer had no control. No amount paid
as a penalty under this Subsection shall be included in any formula
utilized to establish premium rates for workers' compensation
insurance. The total one hundred dollar per calendar day penalty
provided for in this Subsection shall not exceed three thousand dollars
in the aggregate.
Because the payment ledger was properly excluded, there is no evidence in
the record to support Weldon’s first assertion that benefits were converted from
weekly payments to monthly payments other than the arguments of Weldon’s
attorney at the hearing. We find that Weldon failed to prove a violation of the
judgment, and we will not award any penalties for this claim.
Holiday Inn stipulated, however, that they unilaterally decreased benefits to
$400.00 per month upon learning that Weldon sold his stock in a closely-held
corporation for $40,000.00. Holiday Inn became aware of this payment because
Weldon reported income on his 2007 tax return of $27,456.00. Holiday Inn
claimed this payment was the equivalent of wages and decided to offset his
benefits. At the hearing, Weldon testified that prior to 2001 he stopped doing work
for the barbecue sauce business. At that time, another person operated the business
and collected the profits. The payment in 2007 was for the sale of the business and
was the sale of an asset, not wages. We find that in this case, Holiday Inn was not
entitled to offset the amount it was ordered to pay Weldon by the May 10, 2005,
judgment. Therefore, Weldon is entitled to a $3,000.00 penalty pursuant to
La.R.S. 23:1201(G). Weldon is also entitled to attorneys’ fees.
Mileage Reimbursement
The judgment of May 10, 2005, required that Holiday Inn pay for reasonable
and necessary medical treatment, which includes reimbursement for mileage
traveled for medical treatment. The record is clear that Holiday Inn underpaid the
5
mileage reimbursement submitted by Weldon on August 6, 2008. We find that an
award of penalties of $3,000.00 and attorneys’ fees is appropriate for this violation
of the judgment. We are not persuaded by Holiday Inn’s arguments that in order to
award a penalty for failing to pay pursuant to a judgment, the award must be for a
specific sum. Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:1201(G) has no such requirement,
and Holiday Inn has not cited any jurisprudence, nor can we find any, that reads
this requirement into the statute. Furthermore, we find that Holiday Inn had an
ample opportunity and notice and that Weldon was not required to file a disputed
claim for compensation to recover this penalty.
Likewise, we find that Holiday’s failure to pay a mileage reimbursement
submitted by Weldon on September 2, 2009, for four months without any
explanation entitles Weldon to another $3,000.00 penalty and attorneys’ fees.
Denial of Aciphex Prescription
The May 10, 2005, judgment clearly required Holiday Inn to pay for
Weldon’s prescription of Aciphex. Weldon testified that he went to a pharmacy
and the insurance provided by Holiday Inn refused to pay for the prescription to
Aciphex. When he called the number provided on the insurance card provided to
him, they explained that the prescription was not covered. Given the very specific
nature of the judgment, we find that Holiday Inn’s failure to pay for the
prescription entitles Weldon to penalties in the amount of $3,000.00 and attorneys’
fees. Holiday Inn’s argument that Weldon has to introduce the rejected
prescription in order to recover is not persuasive.
Denial of Payment for Hernia Procedure
Finally, Weldon asks for penalties and attorneys’ fees for Holiday Inn’s
failure to pay for a hernia procedure in 2008. Here, we agree with Holiday Inn that
6
this issue is not properly raised by a Motion for Penalties and Attorneys’ Fees. In
the May 10, 2005, judgment, Holiday Inn reserved the right to contest the issue of
whether the hernia was caused by the work-related accident. Thus, the appropriate
way for Weldon to seek payment for these bills is through a disputed claim for
compensation. Furthermore, the issue of the medical payments for the hernia
procedure was only discussed tangentially in the hearing below, and the WCJ
failed to rule on the issue. Thus, it is not ripe for review.
Attorneys’ Fees
We have found that Weldon is entitled to $12,000.00 in penalties for
Holiday Inn’s failure to pay benefits pursuant to the May 10, 2005, judgment.
Weldon’s attorney, Michael Miller, submitted an affidavit showing that he worked
fifty-seven and a half hours on the case and had $216.20 cents in expenses. The
affidavit also stated that his hourly rate is $225.00. The trial court awarded
attorneys’ fees of $12,937.50 (fifty-seven and a half hours at $225.00 per hour).
While we find Miller’s rate reasonable, we find it necessary to decrease the award
by some amount on account of the fact that the issue of payment for the hernia
procedure is included in his affidavit. Mr. Miller also included time spent in the
prosecution of a Motion to Quash unrelated to this hearing. We find that it is
reasonable that thirty-five hours were spent by Mr. Miller on the issues for which
we have awarded penalties and attorneys’ fees, plus four hours for the hearing
below. We also find that the trial court erred in not including the expenses in the
calculation of attorneys’ fees. Thus, we award $8,991.20 for attorneys’ fees to
Weldon. We also award $2,250.00 in attorneys’ fees for work done on appeal.
7
Interest
In Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co., 04-179 (La. 10/29/04), 885 So.2d 562, the
supreme court held that while La.R.S. 23:1201.3 does not require that interest be
included for an award of penalties and attorneys’ fees, it should be awarded where
the claimant prayed for interest in his pleadings. Here, Weldon did pray for
interest on penalties and attorneys’ fees. Thus, it was error for the WCJ to fail to
include interest.
CONCLUSION
The judgment of the WCJ awarding $8,000.00 in penalties and $12,937.50
in penalties is reversed. Holiday Inn is ordered to pay $12,000.00 in penalties for
failure to pay benefits pursuant to a final, nonappealable judgment and $8,991.20
in attorneys’ fees, plus legal interest. We also award $2,250.00 in attorneys’ fees
for work done on appeal. Costs of this appeal are cast in equal portions to Weldon
and Holiday Inn.
REVERSED AND RENDERED.
8