Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Holmes v. Holmes, 6 La. 463.
-
Parker v. Saileau
213 So. 2d 190
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
(1834); Succession of Hubee, 20 La.Ann.
-
Succession of Theriot
185 So. 2d 361
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
909 (1926); (1834); Comment, 7 Tul.L.Rev.
- Succession of Jene 173 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
- Succession of Gaines 79 So. 2d 322 La. 1955
- Patin v. T. L. James Co. 42 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
- Cameron v. Rowland 23 So. 2d 283 La. 1945
- Cameron v. Rowland. 23 So. 2d 285 La. 1945
-
Succession of Gibson
173 So. 185
La. 1937
But it is argued that they did not contract “pursuant to the forms and ceremonies prescribed by law” because there was no license authorizing the justice of the peace to perform the marriage ceremony and no “act made of the marriage.” A full century before the present suit was filed this court said, , at page 470, 26 Am.Dec.
- Russell v. Taglialavore 153 So. 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Succession of Anderson 145 So. 270 La. 1932
- Ducre v. Milner 140 So. 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Oliphant v. Louisiana Long Leaf Lumber Co. 112 So. 500 La. 1927
- Succession of St. Ange 109 So. 909 La. 1926
- Mazzei v. Gruis 55 So. 555 La. 1911
- Hobdy v. Jones 2 La. Ann. 944 La. 1847