cl-7246853
Precedential
Dismissed
Processed
Laville v. Rightor
Laville v. Rightor, 11 La. 198 (1837).
Cited by
- State ex rel. Forsythe v. Judge of the Seventh Judicial District Court 42 La. 1104 La. 1890
- Mallerich v. Mertz 70 La. Ann. 194 La. 1867
Opinion text
Bullard, J,, delivered the opinion of the court. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that it was allowed returnable in March, and the citation is to appear in April. It is stated in the'citation itself, as a reason for thus postponing the return day, that there was not time to make up the transcript. In the case of Hart vs. Fisk, we held that the return day of the appeal cannot be postponed by the judge U quo for the purpose of affording time to make up a transcript .of the record. 10 Louisiana Reports, 481. Much less can it be done by the clerk, contrary to the order of the judge. The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.