Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stokes v. Shackleford, 12 La. 170.

31 citing documents.

Daniel J. Saloom, Et Al. v. State Of Louisiana, Department Of Transportation And Development La. 2022
(1838), where a wife sold sixty acres of community property without her husband’s consent.
Butler v. Butler 212 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
535 ], it was said: “ ‘The heir is bound by the warranty of the person, whose inheritance he accepts.’ “In Stokes v. Shackleford [ ], it was said: “ ‘The heir cannot claim against the warranty of his ancestor, but is estop-ped by it from asserting title, although the title never vested until the ancestor’s death.
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Boudoin 154 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
See LSA-Civil Code Articles 1013, 1423 and 2008; ; Smith v. Elliot, 9 Rob.
Blair v. Arrant 130 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
535 ; ; Smith v. Elliott, 9 Rob.
Louisiana Canal Co. v. Leger 112 So. 2d 667 La. 1959
535 ; ; Smith v. Elliot, 9 Rob.
Watson v. Crown-Zellerbach Corp. 110 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Grilling v. Taft, 151 La.
Callahan v. Authement 77 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
That doctrine was announced as long ago as 1838, , and has been affirmed many times.
Arnett v. Marshall 28 So. 2d 665 La. 1946
Schultz v. Ryan, 131 La.
Lum Chow v. Board of Com'rs 13 So. 2d 857 La. 1943
95 ; ; Noulen v. Perkins, 3 Rob.
McDonald v. Richard 13 So. 2d 712 La. 1943
95 ; ; Rapp v. Lowry, 30 La.Ann.
Lum Chow v. Board of Com'rs for Lafourche Basin Levee Dist. 13 So. 2d 857 La. 1943
95 ; ; Noulen v. Perkins, 3 Rob.
White v. Hodges 9 So. 2d 433 La. 1942
95, 100 ; ; Lee v. Ferguson, 5 La.Ann.
Sears-Roebuck Co. v. Burnett 8 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
95 ; ; Lee v. Ferguson, 5 La.
Griffith's Estate v. Glaze's Heirs 7 So. 2d 62 La. 1942
Rapp v. Lowry, 30 La.Ann.
Long v. Chailan 199 So. 222 La. 1940
That doctrine was announced as long ago as 1838, , and has been affirmed many times.
Little v. Barbe 198 So. 368 La. 1940
*1096 and which has been affirmed many times, that an heir who accepts unconditionally the succession of his ancestor is estopped to claim from a third party property which the ancestor sold under a warranty of title.
Jackson v. United Gas Public Service Co. 198 So. 633 La. 1940
[95], 100; (Stokes v. Shackleford) ."
Cook v. Martin 178 So. 881 La. 1938
535 ; ; Smith v. Elliot, 9 Rob.
Sparks v. Dan Cohen Co. 175 So. 590 La. 1937
The doctrine is recognized in the following cases, cited by counsel for the defendant, viz.: ; Smith v. Elliot, 9 Rob.
Simmons v. Carter 172 So. 425 La. 1937
Cherami v. Cantrelle 142 So. 150 La. 1932
it was said: “The heir cannot claim against the warranty of his ancestor, but is estopped by it from asserting title, although the title never vested until after the ancestor’s death.
St. Landry Oil & Gas Co. v. Neal 118 So. 24 La. 1928
95, 100 ; ; Lee v. Ferguson, 5 La.
Rey v. Culbertson 2 La. App. 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
The cases, Stokes vs. Shackleford, ; Griffing vs. Taft, 151 La.
Guice v. Mason 100 So. 397 La. 1924
95 ; ; Lee v. Ferguson, 5 La.
Brewer v. New Orleans Land Co. 97 So. 605 La. 1923
Wells v. Blackman 46 So. 437 La. 1908
95 ; ; Noulen et al. v. Perkins, 3 Rob.
City of New Orleans v. Riddell 37 So. 966 La. 1905
*1053 ; Lee v. Ferguson, 5 La.
Benton & Milliken v. Sentell 24 So. 297 La. 1898
99 ; Stokes vs. Schackleford, ; Lee vs. Perguson, 5 An.
Edwards v. Fairbanks 27 La. 449 La. 1875
Crocker v. Hoag 25 La. Ann. 159 La. 1873
532; ; 5 N. S. 247; 12 M. 187; Revised Code 3144, 3304; 18 An.
Avery v. Allain 11 Rob. 436 La. 1845