Cited by

149 ; Lalanne’s ; and Succession of Fluker, 32 La.

345 ; Lalanne’s ; Carrollton Land & Imp.

Ball's Administration v. Ball et al., 15 La.

149 ; Lalaune’s Heirs vs. Moreau, ; Valderes, Executrix, vs. Bird and others, 10 Rob.

See Lalanne’s Heirs vs. Moreau, ; Succession of Jacob Hawkins, 35 An.

Lalanne’s Heirs vs. Moreau, .

The sanctity and authenticity of judicial sales founded upon orders •of competent courts is so clearly defined and the principle involved so well stated in Lalanne’s Heirs vs. Morian, , we will •quote it as concisely announcing our views: “ We place our decision,” say the court, “on the broad ground that sales directed and authorized by courts of justice are judicial sales to all intents and purposes,” and in treating of their effect they further say: “ the necessity and wisdom of such a rule of

Nesom vs. Weis et al. 34 A. 1010 ; Duckworth vs. Vaughn, 27 A. 599 ; Succession of Vaughn, 26 A. 150 ; Wright vs. Cummings, 19 A. 353 ; Succession of Gurney, 14 A. 622 ; McCullough vs. Minor, 2 A. 466 ; Lalance’s Heirs vs. Moreau, ; Pintard vs. Deyrio, 3 N. S. 32.

1 Hennen’s Dig., verbo Judgment, p. 811, Nos. 2 and 4; Lalann’s .

In , it is said, if there is a total want of jurisdiction, the proceedings are null and void, and.