DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hubbell v. Clannon, 13 La. 494.

15 citing documents.

  • Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras America 851 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • Perrodin v. SOUTHERN SIDING CO. INC. 524 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Nat. American Bank of New Orleans v. Purvis 407 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    323 (La.1843); (1839).'" The appellant, Statewide, did not furnish this court with a note of evidence and we must therefore assume that the judgment of the trial court is correct.
  • Cvitanovich v. Sorli 347 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Succession of Rock v. Allstate Life Ins. Co. 340 So. 2d 1325 La. 1976
  • Robertson Factories, Inc. v. Southern Apartment Furnishings 316 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    (1839) that the presumption that judicial proceedings were regular obtains only when the contrary does not appear in the record.
  • American Supply Co. of Morgan City v. Petrolane Offshore Construction Services, Inc. 294 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    323 (La.1843); (1839).” I think the presumption should be applied in this case, and the judgment appealed from affirmed.
  • Ascension Builders, Inc. v. Jumonville 263 So. 2d 875 La. 1972
  • Ascension Builders, Inc. v. Jumonville 251 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    This court declared in its early decision in the case of Hubbel [Hubbell] v. Clannon, (1839) that the presumption that judicial proceedings were regular obtains only when the contrary does not appear in the record.” Articles 1702 and 1703 of the Code of Civil Procedure provide as follows: “A judgment of default must be confirmed by proof of the demand sufficient to establish a prima facie case.
  • Baker Finance Co. v. Hines 233 So. 2d 902 La. 1970
    (1839) that the presumption that judicial proceedings were regular obtains only when the contrary does not appear in the record.
  • Harris v. Womack 83 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    448 ; ; Goldman v. Thomson, 3 La.App.
  • Massey v. Consumer's Ice Co. of Shreveport, Inc. 66 So. 2d 789 La. 1953
    also Goldman v. Thomson, 3 La.App.
  • Brown v. Brown 196 So. 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    448 ; ; Goldman v. Thomson, 3 La.App.
  • Martin v. District Grand Lodge No. 21 of the Grand United Order of Odd Fellows, Inc. 146 So. 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    448 , it was held: “Where it is not certified that the record contains all the evidence adduced on the trial, and the judgment purports to have been rendered on due proof of the plaintiffs’ demand, it will be presumed that evidence was offered to satisfy the court, though the record does not otherwise show that any was produced.” , the court, affirming a judgment by default, said: “Where the judgment expresses that it was confirmed and made final on due proof of the plaintiff’s demand, it is suf
  • Goldman v. Thomson 3 La. App. 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    448 , it was held: “Where it is not certified that the record contains all the evidence adduced on the trial, and the judgment purports to have been rendered on due proof of the plaintiff’s demand, it will be presumed that evidence was offered to satisfy the court, though the record does not otherwise show that any was produced.” In Huhhell vs. Clannon, , the court, affirming a judgment by default, said: “The judgment expresses that it was confirmed and made final ‘on due proof of the plaintiff’