Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kerr v. Kerr, 14 La. 177.
-
Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp.
657 So. 2d 1292
La. 1995
365 (La.1844); (1839); Dupey v. Greffin's Executor, 1 Mart.
-
Boeing Co. v. Louisiana Dept. of Economic Development
657 So. 2d 652
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
3 and 925; (1839); In re Perez, 194 La.
-
Brinkhaus v. Senate of State of La.
655 So. 2d 394
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
365 (1845) (1839), at any point in the proceedings.
-
State v. Neisler
633 So. 2d 1224
La. 1994
365 (La.1844); (1839); Dupey v. Greffin's Executor, 1 Mart.
- Barry v. Barry 606 So. 2d 1391 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
Dupuy v. Dupuy
357 So. 2d 23
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
the court said: `No plea to the jurisdiction was made by the defendants, but the want of jurisdiction in this case being ratione materiae, no consent could give it, and the judge was bound to notice it ex officio.'
-
Green v. George
35 So. 2d 595
La. 1948
Dupey v. Greffin’s Executor et al., 1 Mart., N.S., 198; Lafon’s Executor v. Lafon, 1 Mart., N.S., 703; ; Foundation Finance Co., Inc., v. Robbins et al., La.App., 144 So.
-
Louisiana Wholesale Distributors Ass'n v. Rosenzweig
34 So. 2d 58
La. 1947
Dupey v. Greffin’s Executor et al., 1 Mart.,N.S., 198; Lafon’s Executors v. Lafon, 1 Mart., N.S., 703; ; Foundation Finance Co., Inc., v. Robbins et al., La.App.
-
Bercegeay v. Techeland Oil Corp.
24 So. 2d 242
La. 1945
Dupey v. Greffin’s Ex’r et al., 1 Mart.,N.S., 198; Lafon’s Ex’rs v. Lafon, l.Mart.,N.S., 703; ; Foundation Finance Co., Inc., v. Robbins et al., La.App., 144 So.
-
Bercegeay v. Techeland Oil Corporation
24 So. 2d 242
La. 1945
Dupey v. Greffin's Ex'r et al., 1 Mart., N.S., 198; Lafon's Ex'rs v. Lafon, 1 Mart., N.S., 703; ; Foundation Finance Co., Inc., v. Robbins et al., La.App., 144 So.
-
Lopez v. Bertel
198 So. 185
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
135 ; ; Greiner v. Thielen, 6 Rob.
- Mitcham v. Mitcham 173 So. 132 La. 1937
-
McGee v. Gasery
171 So. 49
La. 1936
the court said: “No plea to the jurisdiction was made by the defendants, but the want of jurisdiction in this case being ratione materise, no consent could give it, and the judge was bound to notice it ex officio.” The case of Greiner v. Theilan, Sheriff, 6 Rob.
-
Bank of Winnfield v. Melton
142 So. 300
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1932
(N. S.) 135; ; Greiner v. Thielen, 6 Kob.
- Hemken v. Ludewig 12 La. 188 La. 1845