Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pepper v. Dunlap, 16 La. 163.
-
France v. American Bank
505 So. 2d 1175
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
(1840); See Babin v. Winchester, 7 La.
-
Colonial Financial Service, Inc. v. Stewart
481 So. 2d 186
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
(1840); See Babin v. Winchester, 7 La.
-
U-Finish Homes, Inc. v. Lanzl
202 So. 2d 339
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
9 :- S30S, ; Jones v. Elliott, 4 La.Ann.
- Investors Mortgage Co. v. Theriot 7 La. App. 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
-
Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Scott
3 La. App. 673
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Code of Practice, 707, 708, 709; Pepper vs. Dunlap, ; Merchants Bank vs. Peters, 2 Rob.
-
Forrey v. Strange
105 So. 25
La. 1925
Code of Practice, 707, 708, 709; ; Merchants’ Bank v. Peters, 2 Rob.
- Reugger v. De Brueys 83 So. 556 La. 1919
-
Legendre v. McCall's Estate
68 So. 86
La. 1915
693 ; ; Walton v. Lizardi, 15 La.
-
Interstate Trust & Banking Co. v. Young
65 So. 611
La. 1914
Morris v. Womble, 30 La.
- Varnado v. W. B. Thompson & Co. 55 So. 693 La. 1911
- Bacas v. Hernandez 31 La. 85 La. 1879
- Henderson v. Merchants' Mutual Insurance 25 La. Ann. 343 La. 1873
- Johnson v. Duncan 24 La. Ann. 381 La. 1872
-
Armor v. Downes
2 La. Ann. 242
La. 1847
In support of that position, he invokes the 586th article of the Code of Practice, .
- Robinson v. Aubert 6 Rob. 461 La. 1844
- Merchants' Bank of New Orleans v. Peters 2 Rob. 214 La. 1842
-
Florance v. Orleans Navigation Co.
1 Rob. 224
La. 1842
ch provides, that ‘ when a seizing creditor has a privilege or special mortgage on the property seized, for a debt of which all the instalments are not yet due, he may demand that the property be sold for the whole debt, provided it he on such terms of credit as are granted to the debtor by the original contract for the payment of such instalments as are not due.’ , this court affirmed a judgment of the District Court, ordering the mortgaged property at the suit of the holder of one of the notes