Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Flower v. O'Connor, 17 La. 213.

19 citing documents.

Randall Kling v. Troy Hebert Ernest P. Legier, Jr., in His Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the … La. 2024
Prescription is interrupted when a defendant knows or should know, prior to the expiration of the prescriptive 5 As early as Flower v. O’Connor, (1841), this Court observed: It is clear from this doctrine of Pothier, that in order to determine the effect and extent of a legal interruption, we must enquire more particularly into the object and cause of the action, than the right of the plaintiff, the manner in which it is pr
In Re Med. Malprac. Claims Regard. Diecidue 972 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Nini v. Sanford Brothers, Inc., (1841).
Sam v. Sorrel Electrical Contractors, Inc. 525 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(1841), which in turn had relied on Pothier, the court stated that once a defendant is "judicially notified, so as to acquire a sufficient knowledge of the rights which are sought to be enforced against him by a suit, there results a legal interruption in favor of those to whom the rights may belong."
Giroir v. SOUTH LA. MEDICAL CTR., ETC. 475 So. 2d 1040 La. 1985
Nini v. Sanford Brothers, Inc., (1841).
Peters v. Sentry Insurance 375 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
In that case the court cited the following language from Flower v. O’Connor, (1841): It is clear from this doctrine of Pothier, [8 Oeuvres de Pothier, Traite de la Prescription, Partie I, Chapitre II, No. 54 (1835)] that in order to determine the effect and extent of a legal interruption, we must enquire more particularly into the object and cause of the action, than into the right of the plai
Baker v. Wheless Drilling Co. 347 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
590 (1903); (1841); Myers v. Gulf Public Service Corp., 15 La.App.
Nini v. Sanford Brothers, Inc. 276 So. 2d 262 La. 1973
847 , supra (suit by curator of succession whose appointment was null); Flower v. O'Connor, 1841, (suit by surviving partner of a firm who was non-suited because of lack of authority to represent the others); Becnel v. Waguespack, 1888, 40 La.Ann.
Simms v. Braren 252 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Suits have been considered not nullities although initiated by only one surviving partner on a note due the partnership, Flower v. O’Connor, (1841); or by a curator improperly appointed, Blanc v. Dupre, 36 La.Ann.
Davis v. Royal-Globe Insurance Companies 223 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
847 , supra (suit by curator of succession whose appointment was null); Flower v. O'Connor, 1841, (suit by surviving partner of a firm who was non-suited because of lack of authority to represent the others); Becnel v. Waguespack, 1888, 40 La.Ann.
National Surety Corp. v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. 168 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
The opinion cited Flower, et al. v. O’Connor, , to the effect that where a defendant has been judicially notified of the claim which is the foundation of the demand for the whole of the debt, there is a legal interruption of prescription in favor of those possessing claims to a part.
Nettles v. Great American Insurance Company 155 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
847 , supra (suit by curator of succession whose appointment was null); Flower v. O'Connor, 1841, (suit by surviving partner of a firm who was non-suited because of lack of authority to represent the others); Becnel v. Waguespack, 1888, 40 La.Ann.
Andrepont v. Ochsner 84 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Blanchard v. Smith 45 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Flower v. O’Connor, ; Blanc v. Dupre, 36 La.Ann.
Ray v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins. Co. 180 So. 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
847 , supra (suit by curator of succession whose appointment was null) ; Flower v. O’Connor, 1841, (suit by surviving partner of a firm who was non-suited because of lack of authority to represent the others) ; Becnel v. Waguespack, 1888, 40 La.Ann.
Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New York 168 So. 488 La. 1936
Flower v. O’Connor, ; see, alsoAnding v. Texas & P. Ry.
McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co. 165 So. 632 La. 1936
Flower v. O’Connor, ; see, also, Anding v. Texas & P. R. Co. et al., 158 La.
B. J. Wolf & Sons v. New Orleans Tailor-Made Pants Co. 34 So. 590 La. 1903
Appellants refer the court to Flower v. O’Connor, ; Blanc v. Dupré, 36 La.
Schwartz v. Lake 34 So. 96 La. 1903
In Flower v. O’Connor, , the suit whereof the citation was relied on to interrupt prescription, had been brought on a partnership claim by one of the partners of a dissolved partnership.
Becnel v. Waguespack 40 La. Ann. 109 La. 1888
Flower vs. O’Connor, ; Blanc vs. Dupre, 36 Ann. 847; Satterlee vs. Morgan, 33 Ann. 846.