Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carrollton Rail Road v. Municipality No. 2, 19 La. 62.

17 citing documents.

Edward J. Rachal v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
River Rental Realty LLC v. Deep S. Leasing, LLC 250 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Co. v. Municipality No. Two , , 71 (1841) ).
The Southern Amusement Co., Inc. v. Pat's of Henderson Seafood & Steak,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Because implied dedication lacks the formalities and safeguards of formal or 9 statutory dedication, courts have required “a plain and positive intention to give and one equally plain to accept.” (1841).
South. Amusement Co. v. Pat's of Henderson 871 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'n 851 So. 2d 1006 La. 2003
Vernon Parish Police Jury v. Buckley 829 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
St. Charles Parish School Bd. v. P & L INVESTMENT CORP. 674 So. 2d 218 La. 1996
Hailey v. Panno 472 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
957 (La.1938); Carrollton R. Co. v. Municipality No. 2
Garrett v. Pioneer Production Corp. 390 So. 2d 851 La. 1980
Jefferson Parish School Board v. Jeff, Inc. 164 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1964
656 ; ; Linton v. Guillotte, 10 Rob.
Bell v. Tycer 97 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
286 ; Carrollton R. Co. v. Municipality No. 2, 1841, ; Linton v. Guillotte, 1845, 10 Rob.
Jouett v. Keeney 136 So. 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
“If any dedication was ever intended it remained inchoate, until some evidence of acceptance was exhibited.” Carrollton R. Co. v. Municipality No. 2, .
Martin v. City of Lafayette 8 La. App. 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Ann. 509 ; Carrollton Railroad Co. vs. Municipality No. Two, ; Thomas Wilkins vs. The Parish of Baton Rouge, 10 Rob.
Cook v. City of Opelousas 4 La. App. 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
286 ; Carrollton Railroad Co. vs. Municipality No. 2, ; Ross vs. Garlick, 10 Rob.
Edison Electric Co. v. City of New Orleans 58 So. 512 La. 1912
See, also, Carrollton Railroad Co. v. Municipality No. 2, .
City of New Orleans v. Werlein 24 So. 232 La. 1898
The dedication to public use being once established, can not be affected by any act of the municipal officers.” Not only is it a fact which is inferentially admitted by the defendant, that the property in suit was dedicated to public use by Gravier, but that question was expressly decided and forever put at rest by our predecessors in Railroad Company vs. Municipality No. 2, .
Leland University v. City of New Orleans 47 La. Ann. 100 La. 1895
Carrollton Railroad Company vs. Municipality, ; Linton vs. Guillotte, 10 Rob.