cl-7267725
Precedential
Processed
Chretien v. Richardson
Chretien v. Richardson, 6 La. Ann. 2 (1851).
Cited by
- LeBlanc v. Romero 783 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- American Multigraph Sales Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co. 123 So. 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
- Ward v. Hayes-Ewell Co. 120 So. 585 La. 1929
Opinion text
Slidell, J., concurring. I concur in the decree prepared by Judge Rost, but wish to be considered as not concurring in all the propositions announced in his opinion, and as acting only with reference to the state of the facts presented in this cause. It is proper to add, that my conclusion is adopted with diffidence, especially as I had not the advantago of being present at the argument.