State v. Judge of the Fifth District Court

By the court: Seideui,, J. The application does not assert that the applicants have any interest in the property sequestered, beyond the freight, to wit, $156 28; while, on the other hand, some of its allegations are pregnant with the inference that their interest is thus limited. To authorize us to interfere, by mandamus, a clear showing as to our jurisdiction should be made. The present application being unsatisfactory in its averments, is dismissed at the costs of the applicants.