cl-7269296
Precedential
Processed
Bolling v. Anderson
Bolling v. Anderson, 10 La. Ann. 650 (1855).
Cited by
- Tregre v. Kratzer 144 So. 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Jackson v. Weeden 135 So. 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- Investors' Mortgage Co. v. Aleman 115 So. 383 La. 1927
- Comire v. Schiro Amusement Co. 6 La. App. 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1927
- State v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co. 90 So. 273 La. 1921
- Succession of Morris 66 So. 542 La. 1914
- McCutchen v. Hudson 61 So. 157 La. 1913
- Handlin v. Dodt 34 So. 881 La. 1903
Opinion text
Merrick, C. J. The appeal in this case was applied for by petition at chambers, after the adjournment of court. The petition for an appeal does not pray for a citation, nor does it appear that the appellant ever applied for one. The plaintiff and appellee prays for a dismissal of the appeal, on the ground that he has not been cited to appear in the appellate court. The authority of the cases .of Walker et al. v. Martolo, 18 L. R., 50, and Hezekiah Pratt v. James Erwin, 6 An. Rep., 115, are decisive, and the motion to dismiss must prevail. It is therefore ordered', adjudged and decreed that the appeal in this case he dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.