cl-7269765
Precedential
Processed
Reynolds v. Batson
Reynolds v. Batson, 11 La. Ann. 731 (1856).
Opinion text
Merrick, C. J. In refusing the re-hearing, we take occasion to observe that •we consider our reasoning equally applicable.to the case, if it be conceded that the slaves were stolon, as upon the supposition that they first absconded from the plaintiff’s plantation, and were afterwards found in Teral's possession as ostensible owner. Re-hearing refused.