cl-7286626 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Mulhollan v. M'Crummen

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed September 15, 1823 · 1 Mart. (N.S.) 575

The holding in the court’s own words

We conclude the appellant had nothing in view but delay.

Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.

Opinion text

Martin, J. delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff and appellee has brought *576 up the record, the defendant and appellant having neglected doing so. It appears there is no statement of facts, &c so that we cannot, inquire into the merits of the case—no error is assigned. We conclude the appellant had nothing in view but delay. West’n District Sept. 1823. Oakley for the plaintiff, Scott for the defendant. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment be affirmed; and that the plaintiff recover 10 per cent. damages, on the judgment, with costs in both courts.