cl-7918326
Precedential
Processed
Mitchel v. Jewel
Mitchel v. Jewel, 7 Mart. 185 (La. 1820).
Opinion text
The counsel observed, that as both the clerk and the district judge had certified that the record con *186 tained the whole testimony, the presumption must be that Filhiol, though sworn, was not examined. On this, Turner, for the plaintiff and appellant, moved for and obtained a writ of certiorari. Thereupon, the counsel introduced the affidavit of the defendant, showing that Filhiol was examined.