Court rule
Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule
Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4
Uniform Rules of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal.
Opinions citing this rule
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 22148-KA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1991-01-23 | Affirmed | State v. Bolden |
| No. 22071-KA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1991-01-23 | — | State v. Stanford |
| 22149-KA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1991-01-23 | Affirmed | State v. Anderson |
| No. 89-KA-1539 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1991-01-17 | Affirmed | State v. Bobb |
| 90-KA-603 | La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. | 1991-01-16 | Affirmed | State v. Scott |
| No. CA 891837 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-12-18 | — | Polk Chevrolet, Inc. v. Webb |
| CA 891837 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-12-18 | — | Polk Chevrolet, Inc. v. Webb |
| No. CA 90 0916 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-12-18 | — | State ex rel. Three Minor Children |
| KA 90 0496 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-12-18 | — | State v. Thomas |
| 90-KA-466 | La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. | 1990-12-12 | Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded | State v. Delaune |
| 21901-KA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1990-12-05 | — | State v. Henderson |
| 21,9122-CA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1990-12-05 | — | Sucession of Latham |
| cl-1139098 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-11-26 | — | State v. Sigur |
| 89 KA 2130 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-11-14 | — | State v. Matthews |
| KA 89 2010 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-11-14 | Affirmed | State v. Ruffin |
| 90-KA-357 | La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. | 1990-11-14 | Vacated | State v. Faulkner |
| 90-KA-352 | La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. | 1990-11-14 | Affirmed | State v. Mayeaux |
| 89-CA-1243 | La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. | 1990-10-30 | Affirmed | Goins v. Department of Police |
| No. 89 KA 1586 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-10-16 | — | State v. Davis |
| KA 89 1736 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-10-16 | — | State v. Hawkins |
| No. KA 89 1820 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-10-16 | Affirmed | State v. Hamilton |
| 90 CA 0634 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-10-16 | — | Lindner v. Lindner |
| 90-KA-291 | La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. | 1990-10-11 | — | State v. George |
| 89-233 | La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. | 1990-10-03 | — | Martinez v. Soignier |
| 21802-KA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1990-09-26 | Affirmed | State v. Williams |
| 89 CA 0431 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-08-31 | — | Jackson v. Ascension Parish School Bd. |
| 89-KA-0230, 89-KA-0888 | La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. | 1990-06-28 | Affirmed | State v. Granier |
| 89 KA 1509 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-06-26 | Affirmed | State v. Jones |
| 90-KA-118 | La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. | 1990-06-25 | Affirmed | State v. Burrow |
| No. 89-CA-2019 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-05-31 | Reversed and remanded | Brooks-Harbour & Associates, Inc. v. Mustakas |
| No. KA-6433 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-05-31 | — | State v. Martinez-Sanchez |
| KA 89 0509 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-05-30 | — | State v. Daughtery |
| KA 89 0956 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-05-30 | — | State v. Schaub |
| KA 89 0949 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-05-30 | — | State v. King |
| 90-CA-38 | La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. | 1990-05-16 | Affirmed | LeBlanc v. Alton Ochsner Medical Found. |
| No. 89-KA-1636 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-05-15 | Affirmed | State v. Batiste |
| 21392-CA, 21393-CA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1990-04-04 | — | Lincoln Parish Police Jury v. Davis |
| No. 21406-KA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1990-04-04 | Affirmed | State v. London |
| No. 89-KA-0085 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-03-14 | Affirmed | State v. Washington |
| 20922-KA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1990-02-28 | Set aside | State v. Brown |
| KA 890389 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-02-21 | — | State v. Hall |
| 88-CA-0511 | La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. | 1990-02-15 | — | Dupuy v. Riley |
| No. 89-KA-628 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-02-14 | Amended | State v. Martin |
| No. 88-KA-0905 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1990-01-30 | Remanded | State v. Smith |
| No. 21206-KA | La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. | 1990-01-24 | Affirmed | State v. Brown |
| 89 KA 0163 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1989-12-19 | — | State v. Odom |
| KA 88 2026 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1989-12-19 | Affirmed | State v. Jack |
| KA 88 1965 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1989-12-19 | — | State v. Hicks |
| CA 88 1835 | La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. | 1989-12-19 | Reversed in part and rendered, affirmed in part, amended in part, and as amended, affirmed | Solar v. Griffin |
| CR89-338 | La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. | 1989-12-13 | Affirmed | State v. Ashworth |