Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 773 So. 2d 670.

281 citing documents.

Craft v. Ports Am. Gulfport, Inc. 273 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/30/00), , 682 (quoting Keeth v. Dept. of Pub.
Dawn Nolen v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
10/30/00), (citations omitted) defined general damages as “those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude;” and “involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of 8 intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or life-st
Chad Langlinais and Wendy Lejeune v. Derrick Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Langlinais v. Leblanc 272 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Etienne v. C. Thompson Auto., Inc. 269 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/30/00), , 682 ; Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc. , , 507 (La.1978) ; Anderson v. Welding Testing Lab., Inc. , , 352 (La.1974)....
Arthur Etienne, Jr. v. C. Thompson Automotive, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
10/30/00), Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Lab., Inc., .
Antippas v. Nola Hotel Grp., LLC 265 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Aaron v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 271 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/30/00), , 680-81, cert.
McBride v. Lichtenstein 260 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Washington v. Onebeacon Am. Ins. Co. 265 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Latulippe v. Braun 253 So. 3d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Woods v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, L.L.C. 251 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Antley v. Rodgers 251 So. 3d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Donald Welch v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Co., 00-66 (La.10/30/00)
Antonio Fontenot v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Co., 00-66 (La.10/30/00)
Fontenot v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 247 So. 3d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Christina Mink Dauzat v. State Farm Mutual Automobile ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
10/30/00), (citations omitted) defined general damages as “those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude;” and “involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or life-style which cannot be definitely measured in
Michael Albarado, Individually v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
10/30/00), (citation omitted), the supreme court set forth the standard for a determination of general damages, stating: “General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they ‘involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physic
Albarado v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 247 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/30/00), , 682 (citation omitted), the supreme court set forth the standard for a determination of general damages, stating: "General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they 'involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical
Simple Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas Property, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
10/30/00), (quoting Keeth v. Dep’t of Pub.
Marguerite Fugler Cardwell v. Oaks Care Center, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
10/30/00), (quoting Keeth v. Dep’t of Pub.
Cardwell v. Oaks Care Ctr., LLC 258 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/30/00), , 682 (quoting Keeth v. Dep't of Pub.
Ronald Lee Stutes and Carroll Lynn Stutes v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Ronald Lee Stutes and Carroll Lynn Stutes v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Ronald Lee Stutes, Et Ux. v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Thomas v. Boyd 245 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
10/30/00), ; Fuller v. D.L.
Tobice Pritchard v. Geico Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Pritchard v. Geico Ins. Co. 242 So. 3d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Urquhart v. Spencer 224 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/30/00), -81 , the Supreme Court summarized the standard of review applicable to allocation of fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
Aaron v. McGowan Working Partners 223 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Romano v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 221 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Levy v. Lewis 219 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/30/00), , stated: “Awards will not be made in the absence of medical testimony that they are indicated and setting out their probable cost.” The plaintiff must show that future medical expenses more probably than not will be incurred, he must show that they are needed, and he must supply estimates of their probable cost.
Kodie J. Courville, Et Ux. v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, pp. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), -81, stated that the standard of review applicable to comparative fault determinations is as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by 5 appellate cou
Terry v. Simmons 215 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Jasmine Jones v. Progressive Security Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
10/30/00), regarding a determination of general damages: “General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they ‘involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or life-s
Jones v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 209 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
10/30/00), regarding a determination of general damages: “General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they ‘involve mental or physical *926 pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or lifestyle which cannot be
Wise v. Nanda 211 So. 3d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc. 211 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Pinn v. Pennison 209 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Jude K. Menard v. Dr. John Stroy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Menard v. Stroy 210 So. 3d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Susan Arnaud, Et Vir. v. Ronald Dies La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Co., 00-66, p. 13 (La.10/30/00), (quoting Keeth v. Dep’t of Pub.
Arnaud v. Dies 208 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
10/30/00), (quoting Keeth v. Dep’t of Pub.
Plaia v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 229 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
10/30/00), , 680-81 the Supreme Court summarized the standard of review applicable to allocation of fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
Massery v. Rouse's Enterprises, L.L.C. 196 So. 3d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066, pp. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), -81 (citing Clement v. Frey, 96-1119 (La.1/16/96), , 609, 610).
Fuller v. D.L. Peterson Trust Co. 197 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), ; Caldwell v. ANPAC Insurance Co., 50,333 (La.App.2d Cir.01/13/16), ; Brown v. City of Monroe, 48,764 (La.App.2d Cir.02/26/14), .
Stephanie Brooke Leblanc v. Terry Lynn Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
10/30/00), )(emphasis added).
Thalia Renfro v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rr La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Renfro v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. 193 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 00-66 (La.10/30/00), .
Hieu Phuong Hoang v. Thornton Services, Inc. 192 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 00-0066, p. 11 (La.10/30/00), -81 .