DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 773 So. 2d 670.

281 citing documents.

  • Hutchins v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 844 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    As stated in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00) , an appellate court's determination of whether the trial court was clearly wrong in its allocation of fault is guided by the factors set forth in Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
  • S.S. v. State ex rel. Department of Social Services 846 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00); , cert dismissed, 532 U.S. 992 , 121 S.Ct.
  • Caffery v. White 846 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co., 00-66 (La.10/30/00); , cert.
  • Duzon v. Stallworth 866 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Adams v. Chenault 836 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Irsch v. Argonaut Great Cent. Ins. Co. 841 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • Bassett v. Toys" R" US Delaware, Inc. 836 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), ; Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.07/05/94), .
  • Bader v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RWY. CO. 834 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/30/00), .
  • Drouant v. Jones 834 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    E.g. Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), ; Lewis v. State, DOTD, 94-2370 (La.4/21/95), .
  • Wingfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Compare Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 2000-0066, p. 7 (La.10/30/00), , cert.
  • Wingfield v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Compare Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.10/30/00), , cert.
  • Conner v. Stelly 830 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00); , writ dismissed, 532 U.S. 992 , 121 S.Ct.
  • Updegraff v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 828 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    The Supreme Court recently reiterated the role of the appellate court in reviewing general damages in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX pp. 13-14 (La.10/30/00), -83 , cert.
  • Updegraff v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 828 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    The Supreme Court recently reiterated the role of the appellate court in reviewing general damages in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 2000-0066 pp. 13-14 (La.10/30/00), -83 , cert.
  • Street v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. 829 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., 00-0066 (La.10/80/00), ; Craighead v. Preferred Risk Mutual Ins.
  • Dugas v. Derouen 824 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066, p. 13 (La.10/30/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court provided the following guidelines: General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they "involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or lifestyl
  • Gagnard v. ZURICH AMER. INS. CO. 819 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Co., 00-0066 *495 (La.10/30/00); ; Carrier v. Nobel Ins.
  • LeBleu v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 824 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Co., 00-66, p. 13 (La.10/30/00); , cert.
  • Squibb v. Century Group, Inc. 824 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, pp. 13-14 (La.10/30/00); -83 , the supreme court revisited the role of an appellate court reviewing a general damage award in light of its decision in Youn : *365 [T]he role of the appellate court in reviewing general damage awards is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discreti
  • Vallien v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 812 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Co., 00-0066, pp. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), -81 (citations omitted), cert.
  • Seal v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 816 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.11/3/00), (citing Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins., Co., ).
  • Bowie v. Young 813 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    [5] See Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66 (La.10/30/00); , wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court considered the lowest life expectancy figure in the record in calculating future medical expenses.
  • Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. Dumas 811 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    In Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), -681 , the supreme court stated: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
  • Joseph v. Entergy 811 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.10/30/00), (citing Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, ).
  • Darbone v. State 815 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Co., 00-66 (La.11/3/00); .
  • Dennis v. Turner 806 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    art. 2324.1; Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 2000-0066 (La.10/30/00), , cert.
  • Cox v. Moore 805 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    1059, 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994), and recently reiterated in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, pp. 13-14 (La.10/30/00); -83 , cert.
  • Dumas v. City of New Orleans 803 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    *1006 General damages The Louisiana Supreme Court recently discussed the standard of appellate review of a trial court's general damage award in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/03/00), , as follows: General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they "involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or lifestyle which cannot be defin
  • Fontenot v. Southwestern Offshore Corp. 787 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    10/30/00); ; Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Menard v. City of Lafayette 786 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Co., 00-66, p. 4 (La.10/30/00); -76 , the supreme court set forth the four factors which must be present for a plaintiff to establish liability on the part of another: In order to determine whether liability exists under the facts of a particular case, our Court has adopted a duty-risk analysis.
  • Odom v. City of Lake Charles 790 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994), and recently reiterated in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, pp. 13-14 (La.11/3/00); -83 (citations omitted): General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they "involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or lifestyle which cannot be definitely measured in