DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 773 So. 2d 670.

282 citing documents.

  • Pg Diners, Inc. v. Remson-Haley Architects, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    10/30/00), -81, set forth the standard for reviewing comparative fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
  • Specialized Com. Lending v. Murphy-Blossman 978 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Kourtney Phillips v. Cecilia Osmun La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    10/30/00), writ dismissed, 532 U.S. 992, 121 S.Ct.
  • Phillips v. Osmun 967 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Co., 00-66, p. 13 (La.10/30/00), , writ dismissed, 532 U.S. 992 , 121 S.Ct.
  • Charles Layssard v. State of La., Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, p. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), -81, set forth the standard for reviewing comparative fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
  • Layssard v. STATE, DEPART. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 963 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, pp. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), -81 , set forth the standard for reviewing comparative fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
  • Stephanie Hayes v. Jason C. Covey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2 The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, p. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), -681, set forth the standard for reviewing comparative fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
  • Kaiser v. Hardin 953 So. 2d 802 La. 2007
    DISCUSSION GENERAL DAMAGES In Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), , we set forth the standard for appellate review of general damage awards: General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they "involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or lif
  • Coleman v. Townsend 948 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Co., 2000-0066 (La.10/30/00), , cert.
  • Paul Darren Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. and Venson R. Aymond La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, p. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), -81, set forth the standard for reviewing comparative fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
  • Williams v. Aymond 945 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, pp. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), -81 , set forth the standard for reviewing comparative fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard *831 of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
  • Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
    In Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.10/30/00), , we summarized the standard for reviewing allocation of fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
  • Arseneaux v. Gray Ins. Co. 943 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066, p. 3 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Linnear v. Centerpoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy 945 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), , cert.
  • McGee v. AC AND S, INC. 933 So. 2d 770 La. 2006
    Duncan v. Kansas City S. R.R., 00-0066, p. 13 (La.10/30/00), ; Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Lab., Inc.
  • Bader v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 930 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    The Louisiana Supreme Court considered the issue of federal preemption in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company, 2000-0066 (La.10/30/00), , cert.
  • Bergeron v. Williams 933 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Nelson v. City of Shreveport 921 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), ; Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.01/16/96), .
  • Nelson v. City of Shreveport 921 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), ; Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.01/16/96), .
  • Betty Jean Hargrove v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Hargrove v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 925 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Duncan v. Kansas City S., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), , cert.
  • Galmiche v. State Farm Insurance Co. 923 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 2000-0066, p. 13 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Cobb v. Delta Exports, Inc. 918 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Duncan v. Kansas Southern Railway Co., 00-66 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Johnny Leroy Cobb v. Delta Exports, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Joseph Moraus v. Jennifer Frederick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Moraus v. Frederick 916 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Past and Future General Damages, Past Special Damages The Louisiana Supreme Court explained the standard of review of general damage awards in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66, pp. 13-14 (La.10/30/00), -83 , cert.
  • Smith v. Tidewater Inc. 918 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.10/30/00); .
  • Royce Monk v. State of La., Dotd Consolidated With Dana Vezinat v. State of La., Dotd Consolidated With … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66 (La.10/30/00), cert.
  • Monk v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 908 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66 (La.10/30/00), , cert.
  • Elridge Menard and Pauline Menard v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    They “involved mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or life-style which cannot be definitely measured in monetary terms.” Duncan v. Kansas City, 00-66 (La.10/30/00), cited in LeBleu v. Safeway Ins.
  • Menard v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co. 906 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Duncan v. Kansas City, 00-66 (La.10/30/00), , cited in LeBleu v. Safeway Ins.
  • Hanks v. Seale 904 So. 2d 662 La. 2005
    Railway Co., 00-0066, p. 17 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Donald A. Cross v. Timber Trails Apartments La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Cross v. Timber Trails Apartments 899 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Seals v. SHELTER INS. COMPANIES 894 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    3d Cir.11/3/99), , affirmed 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), , the court affirmed a mental anguish award of $250,000 and $100,000 for negligent infliction of emotional distress where a seven-year-old child was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress syndrome following a van accident where one of her sisters was killed and the other was rendered a quadriplegic.
  • Daniels v. Seruntine 900 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), -81 .
  • LeMasters v. Boyd Gaming Corp. 898 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), .
  • De La Cruz v. Riley 895 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 10/30/00), citing Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); 610 .
  • Garrett v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., LLC 894 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-66 (La.11/3/00), .
  • Julie Guidry v. Coregis Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    10/30/00), (citations omitted).
  • Guidry v. Coregis Ins. Co. 896 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Co., 00-66, pp. 10-11 (La.10/30/00), (citations omitted).
  • Thibodeaux v. Jurgelsky 879 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    10/30/00), , cited in LeBleu v. Safeway Ins.
  • McCarter v. Sanchez 874 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 2000-0066 (La.10/30/00), , the Louisiána Supreme Court stated as follows: General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they “involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or lifestyle which cannot be def
  • Thonn v. Cook 863 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066, p. 10-11 (La.10/30/00); -681 , the Louisiana Supreme Court has set forth the standard for reviewing comparative fault determinations: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations.
  • Dehart v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad 860 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 855 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    10/30/00), , cited in LeBleu v. Safeway Ins.
  • Earl Lee Scott and Felicia A. Scott v. James Ray Roberts and State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Scott v. Roberts 856 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    General damages are described in the Louisiana Supreme Court's opinion in Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066, p. 13 (La.10/30/00), , cert.
  • Estate of Hickerson v. Zimmerman 853 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co. 00-0066 (La.10/30/00), -681 .
  • Chisholm v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co. 850 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    See Duncan v. Kansas City Railway Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.10/30/00), (affirming an award of $475,000 each to the parents of a 12 year old killed in a train collision); Harris v. Carter, 33,951 (La.App.2d Cir.10/4/00), , writ denied XXXX-XXXX (La.1/5/01), (award of $315,000 for wrongful death in a police shooting).