Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 774 So. 2d 84.

229 citing documents.

Nugent v. Car Town of Monroe, Inc. 206 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Ron Warren, Ind & Obo Est. of D. Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Ron Warren, Ind. & O/B/O Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Ron Warren, Ind & Obo Est. of D. Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Guillaume v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 198 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445 (La.11/28/00), ; Grantham v. Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport, 49,-474 (La.App.2d Cir.11/19/14), -4 , writ denied, 2014-2654 (La.03/06/15), .
Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 196 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00), .
Pitts v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 197 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores,, Inc., 2000-0445, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), , citing Gibson v. Bossier City Gen.
Tommy Dubois, Et Ux. v. Gordon Armstrong La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Dubois v. Armstrong 186 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“The standard of review for a JNOV on appeal is a'two part inquiry.” Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, p. 5 (La.11/28/00), .
Sherry Wedgeworth, Et Ux. v. Tynes E. Mixon, III, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
11/28/00), (citations omitted), as follows: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
Wedgeworth v. Mixon 184 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The criteria used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted was discussed in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), (citations omitted), as follows: A JNOV is warranted When the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party 'that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
Baker Ready Mix, LLC v. Crown Roofing Services, Inc. 183 So. 3d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), (“Whether to grant a new trial requires a discretionary balancing of many factors.”).
Allen v. Allen 184 So. 3d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
Wilson v. Wilson 181 So. 3d 786 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
Arnaud v. Scottsdale Insurance Co. 182 So. 3d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, 2000-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
Bilbe v. Foster 176 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075, p. 38 (La.6/26/09), (quoting Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), ).
Show & Tell of New Orleans, L.L.C. v. Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church 171 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“In making this determination, the court should not evaluate the credibility of the witnesses and all reasonable inferences or factual questions should be resolved in favor of the non-moving party.” Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 4 (La.1811/28/00), (quoting Smith v. Davill Petroleum Company, Inc. d/b/a Piggly Wiggly, 97-1596 (La.App.
Skillman v. Riverside Baptist Church of Jefferson Parish 171 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), ; Scott v. Hospital Serv.
Stevenson v. Serth 169 So. 3d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), .
Williams v. Walgreen Louisiana Co. 168 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00), ; Scott v. Hospital Serv.
Bernard M. Boudreaux, Jr. v. Paul Christopher Cummings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Boudreaux v. Cummings 170 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
at 983 (quoting Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00), ).
Patricia Ann Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
11/28/00), Melton v. Smith, 41,456 (La.App.
Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. 158 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), ; Melton v. Smith, 41,456 (La.App.
Grantham v. Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport 152 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445 (La.11/28/00), ; Carney v. Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport, 48,761 (La.App.2d Cir.1/29/14), .
Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Serpas v. Tulane University Hospital & Clinic 161 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/15/08), ; citing Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 5 (La.11/28/00), .
Carney v. Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport 132 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445 (La.11/28/00), ; Milton v. E & M Oil Co., 45,528 (La.App.2d Cir.9/22/10), .
Serice Craft v. Estate of Michael David Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2 More recently, in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, p. 5 (La.11/28/00), the supreme court articulated the standard of review on appeal for a JNOV: The standard of review for a JNOV on appeal is a two part inquiry.
Serice Craft v. Angelle Concrete Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2 More recently, in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, p. 5 (La.11/28/00), the supreme court articulated the standard of review on appeal for a JNOV: The standard of review for a JNOV on appeal is a two part inquiry.
Mandina, Inc. v. O'Brien 156 So. 3d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 6/4/08), (citing Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00), )).
Cobb v. Mitchell 121 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 4 (La.11/28/00), .
Melissa Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA 117 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
Corona v. Teaford 116 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Our Supreme Court reiterated that criteria in Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc., 05-0257, pp. 24-25 *801 (La.9/6/06), , citing Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), , 89 as follows: The standard to be used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted has been set forth in our jurisprudence as follows: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reason
Jo Anna Savant v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
11/28/00), the supreme court articulated the standard of review on appeal for a JNOV: The standard of review for a JNOV on appeal is a two part inquiry.
Savant v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. 104 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
More recently, in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, p. 5 (La.11/28/00), , the supreme court articulated the standard of review on appeal for a JNOV: The standard of review for a JNOV on appeal is a two part inquiry.
Ambrose v. Walt Disney Parks & Resorts, LLC 105 So. 3d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), .
Martin v. Walker 107 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), ; Hogue v. Sussmane-Stubbs, 34,340 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/01), .
Wood v. Humphries 103 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), , citing Gibson v. Bossier City Gen.
Hammons v. St. Paul ex rel. St. Paul 101 So. 3d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 10/15/08), ; citing Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 5 (La.11/28/00), .
Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co. 103 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
Leslie Schilling v. Lynn W. Aurich, ph.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00)
Schilling v. Aurich 91 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
Goudia v. Mann 98 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), (citations omitted).
Gutierrez v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 92 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
Caskey v. Merrick Construction Co. 86 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.04/03/01), ; Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
Midland Funding LLC v. Kelly 81 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 6/4/08), (citing Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00), ).
Roger Vestal v. Cynthia D. Kirkland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Vestal v. Kirkland 81 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00), .
Explained Everette Davis, Jr., Et Ux. v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
As this Court has stated, the decision of “[w]hether to grant a new trial requires a discretionary balancing of many factors.” Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), ( (La.App.