DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 774 So. 2d 84.

229 citing documents.

  • Delco v. Stafford 844 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Mills v. Jaume 836 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • Madison v. ERNEST N. MORIAL CONVENT. CENTER 834 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    The Supreme Court explained the standard to be used in determining whether a JNOV is appropriate in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), , 89: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Green v. K-Mart Corp. 834 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In its brief, K-Mart urges that the "falling merchandise" standard set forth by the supreme court in Smith v. Toys `R' Us, Inc., 98-2085 (La.11/30/99); , and Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00); , are inapplicable to this case because the shelf fell, which caused the merchandise to fall.
  • Davis v. Witt 831 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00); , the supreme court discussed the standard to be used in determining whether a trial court properly granted a JNOV: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Melder v. Paul 831 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    art.1973 which provides: “A new trial may be granted in any case if there is good ground therefor, except as otherwise provided by law.” In Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, pp. 10-11 (La.11/28/00); -94 , the supreme court discussed at length a trial court’s grant of a new trial under La.Civ.Code P. art.1972 or art.1973, explaining: Whether to grant a new trial requires a discretionary balancing of many factors.
  • Yohn v. Brandon 835 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    See Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 12-13 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Guidry v. Millers Cas. Ins. Co. 822 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Distinguished Jackson v. SEARS AUTH. RETAIL DEALER STORE 821 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    See, Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/00), .
  • Johnston v. Hendricks 821 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.04/03/01), ; Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Hall v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 816 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Wal-Mart also relies on Mary Davis v. Wal-Mart, Inc., -0445 (La.11/28/00), rehearing denied, 2000-0445 (La.6/15/01), , claiming that Mr. Hall failed to establish the numbered requisites in a fading merchandise case.
  • Bowie v. Young 813 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    See also Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00); .
  • Junot v. Morgan 818 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard to be used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict
  • Delco v. Stafford 813 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), , 89 the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard to be used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Strain v. Indiana Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Co. 818 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard to be used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict
  • Darbone v. State 815 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00); .
  • King v. Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc. 806 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), ; Stepherson, supra.
  • Branch v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 806 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    2 Recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the law for falling merchandise cases in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), , extensively citing its pronouneement in Smith v. Toys ‘R’ Us, 98-2085 (La.11/30/99), : In a “falling merchandise” case under R.S.
  • Adams v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 804 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.11/28/00), (citations omitted).
  • Templet v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. and Development 818 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), -90 , the Louisiana Supreme Court outlined the standard, as set forth in our jurisprudence, to be used in determining whether a JNOV was properly granted as follows: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable j
  • Coleman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 802 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Griffin v. Louisiana Sheriff's Auto Risk 802 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    The most recent discussion by our supreme court regarding the law on JNOV and the applicable standard of review is found in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/00), : La.
  • Dufrene v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania 790 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), , citing Anderson, supra.
  • Harris v. United Agents Insurance Co. of Louisiana 784 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00); , the court stated as follows: La.
  • Smith v. Lee 783 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    art. 1811 and Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445
  • Stepherson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 785 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), ; Smith, supra ; Mannina, supra.
  • Explained Martin v. Heritage Manor South 784 So. 2d 627 La. 2001
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), ( (La.App.
  • McClary v. Schiro 801 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    DISCUSSION Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict In Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), , the *401 Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the law and standard of review applicable to a JNOV: La.Code of Civil Procedure art. 1811(F) is the authority for a JNOV.
  • Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 784 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    This strict standard for granting a JNOV was recently reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Davis v. Wal-Mart, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/00), .